Former Biglaw Partner is Suspended After Writing Himself Checks from Firm, Claiming Gambling Addiction

“A former partner at Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker has been suspended after an ethics panel concluded that he wrote himself checks from the law firm’s operating account and then lied about a gambling addiction,” reports the ABA Journal.

“Las Vegas lawyer Kym Cushing was suspended for nine months in a Jan. 31 opinion by the Nevada Supreme Court.”

“According to findings of fact in the case, Cushing wrote three checks from his law firm’s operating account and deposited them into his personal bank account. When the law firm confronted him about the checks, Cushing lied and said he was reimbursing himself for payments made to an expert witness.”

Read the ABA Journal article.




Sedgwick Declares Bankruptcy in Filing that Traces the Law Firm’s Downfall

Sedgwick, the dissolved law firm, filed for bankruptcy Tuesday in federal bankruptcy court in San Francisco, reports the ABA Journal.

“The firm generally estimates its liabilities at up to $50 million and says in a declaration that there are about $32.6 million in claims from the termination of office leases as well as about $9.2 million owed in accounts payable. The firm had assets of about $1.56 million in cash and recoverable accounts receivable of about $1.5 million, the declaration says.”

“The firm is analyzing whether it has clawback claims against former partners.”

“Sedgwick had its best year in 2012 with $212 million in gross revenue … According to the bankruptcy declaration, Sedgwick ‘established a well-deserved reputation for high-end insurance work and as one of the pre-eminent product liability firms in the country.’”

Read the ABA Journal article.




Words & Actions Can Bind You Beyond The Terms of a Previously Agreed Upon Subcontract Agreement

“In a recent case before Justice Andrea Masley, Corporate Electrical Technologies, Inc. v. Structure Tone, Inc. et al., Plaintiff Corporate Electrical Technologies, Inc. (“CET”), a subcontractor, was hired by Structure Tone, Inc. (“STI”), a general contractor, to perform electrical work on a multi-million dollar renovation project at a Macy’s flagship store in Herald Square, in anticipation of the holiday shopping season.” reports Sonia A. Russo in Farrel Fritz Attorney’s New York Commercial Division Practice Blog.

“CET argued that soon after the renovation work commenced, the project was delayed to the point that Macy’s took over the day-to-day running of the renovation project. Once Macy’s took over, it directly negotiated with CET and requested that CET perform extra work beyond CET’s subcontractor agreement with STI. Based on the additional work performed, CET submitted numerous unpaid change orders and brought this action against STI and Macy’s, alleging that it was owed over a million dollars for the project.”

Read the article.

 




Does Your Contract Protect You from ‘Gross Negligence’?

“At some point, every custom integrator will run into a litigious client. Fortunately, your written contract protects you against basic errors and omissions on the job. But it can get dicey when the client claims the work you performed was ‘grossly negligent.’ Even with a specific clause in your contract stating you are not liable for gross negligence, it is not legally enforceable and might result in the entire contract being deemed invalid by a judge. So what should you do and what is gross negligence anyway?” asks Jason Knott in CEPro’s Business Support.

“Legal expert Ken Kirshenbaum, says the definition of gross negligence is somewhat murky. He notes that every client contract should include a clause that excludes the integrator from liability for negligence on the part of the company or its subcontractors.”

“Unfortunately, gross negligence is defined differently by the courts in different states. ”

Read the CEPro article.

 




Former Biglaw Lawyer Files Suit Claiming Firm Fired Him Because of Nerve-Compression Disability

“A former lawyer at Arent Fox filed a lawsuit Wednesday that claims that his nerve-compression disability led the law firm to reduce his assignments, change his job duties, and then terminate his employment.” reports Debra Cassens Weiss in the ABA Journal.

“Cornell Crosby, an intellectual property lawyer, filed the disability discrimination suit in state court in Los Angeles. He is seeking $300,000 in economic damages, along with damages for emotional distress.”

“Crosby alleges that the law firm violated California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act by retaliating against him based on his disability, his medical leaves and his accommodation requests.”

Read the ABA Journal’s article.




St. Pete Attorney Arrested for Bringing Cell Phone into County Jail

“A St. Petersburg attorney has been arrested after bringing a cellphone into the Pinellas County Jail back in December.” reports WFLA 8.

“According to Pinellas County deputies, 54-year-old Douglas Barnard went to the Pinellas County Jail on Dec. 11 to meet an inmate who he told jail personnel was his client. Only lawyers and other professional visitors are allowed jail access to personally visit inmates. All other inmate visitation is done through video.”

“Per the Pinellas County Jail policy, Barnard was reminded that all cell phones and other electronic devices are prohibited to ensure inmates do not inappropriately get access to electronic devices. He assured staff that he did not have his cell phone and stated that he ‘left it in the car.’”

“Barnard was arrested on Wednesday for the introduction of contraband at the Demens Landing boat ramp at 12:40 p.m. and taken to the Pinellas County Jail without incident.”

Read WFLA 8’s article.




Judge Suspends License of Attorney Charged in Jennifer Dulos Case

“A judge has temporarily suspended the law license of the attorney charged for his alleged role in the Jennifer Dulos homicide, a court ruling Tuesday indicated.” reports Lisa Backus in the StamfordAdvocate.

Brian Staines, the state’s Chief Disciplinary Counsel, filed a motion this month for the law license of Kent Mawhinney to be temporarily suspended and another attorney appointed as a trustee for his clients while the criminal case is pending.

“Due to his incarceration and any conditions that may be imposed upon his release from custody cannot attend to the legal needs of his clients and there exists a substantial threat of irreparable harm to his clients or to prospective clients,” Staines said.

Read the StamformAdvocate’s article.




North Dakota Lawyer Files $6M Lawsuit Against Judge and Police

Henry H. Howe, 78, a longtime defense attorney in Grand Forks, has filed a lawsuit against one judge, one sheriff’s deputy and two special agents with the North Dakota Bureau of Criminal Investigation. Howe accuses them of “fabricating evidence and giving false testimony in a high-profile case” and is seeking $6 million in damages, reports C.S. Hagaen on INFORUM.

Howe was “arrested during a meeting inside the Walsh County Courthouse on Jan. 30, 2014, and charged with conspiracy to commit murder and later with criminal conspiracy to tamper with a witness.”

“Although the charges against Howe were dismissed, the lawsuit alleges he suffered irreparable harm from the coordinated or reckless actions of Whelan, BCI agents Steven Gilpin and Scott Kraft, and Grand Forks County Sheriff’s Deputy Delicia Glaze.”

Read INFORUM’s article.




Indiana Lawyer Faces DUI Charges After Announcing Candidacy

Charles Richard Martin, an Indiana attorney, was arrested early Thursday after an Indiana State Police trooper pulled him over. He was “arrested on drunken driving charges shortly after announcing his candidacy for the state Legislature.” reports The Tribune.

“The 50-year faced misdemeanor charges of operating a vehicle while intoxicated and was cited for speeding 65 mph in a 45 mph zone, among other things.”

Martin has held several positions in the Republican Party. On Tuesday the attorney sent an email to supporters and journalists announcing his bid to succeed Republican Rep.

Read The Tribune article.




Arbitration Agreement Invalidated; It Was Not Explained To The Patient

“The patient was age 53 when he was transferred to Kindred Hospital. He had been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis and bipolar disorder in his twenties. When he signed the arbitration agreement in issue, he had required 24-hour nursing care for the previous 13 years, although he was not cognitively impaired at the time of the signing.” reports the Law Office of Donald D. Vanarelli in their blog.

“After he filed a negligence suit regarding pressure ulcers he had developed, the hospital filed a motion to dismiss his complaint and compel arbitration, based on the arbitration agreement the patient had signed. The hospital’s motion was denied, and an appeal was filed. On appeal, the Appellate Division affirmed.”

The appeals court noted “The arbitration agreement was not explained to him; he was only told to sign all the documents. He did so, including the “voluntary” arbitration agreement. Every document was signed within the span of one minute. The arbitration agreement stated that his signature was not a precondition to treatment, and that he could cancel it within 5 days; however, he was not provided a copy of the arbitration agreement.”

Read the article.




Legal Funding Impacts Taxes, On Funding & Later Settlement

“Lawyers and clients often need cash. There is also the element of risk. Lawyers and clients may want to lay off some of the risk of a case on someone else, and the litigation finance industry generally offers non-recourse money.” advises Robert W. Wood in the Taxes section of Forbes.

He explains that “Lawyers may seek funding, the clients alone may seek it, or each may get some, depending on how the deal is structured. But one of the most consistent questions is how taxes will be handled, and that depends on the documents. Financing documents vary materially, so one can’t answer the tax questions without reviewing them. Fundamentally, is this a loan? Is it a sale of a portion of the claim, or of a portion of the fees?”

“These may sound like simple questions, but they can be difficult to answer.”

Read the Forbes article.

 




The Sandbagging Conundrum Explained

“There is perhaps no more consistently vexing problem for transactional attorneys on opposite sides than figuring out a fair contractual resolution for “sandbagging” issues.” warns Allison J. Sherrier in Goulston & Storrs’ What’s Market.

“One problem for attorneys is the extraordinary difficulty of defining and proving what kind of actual or constructive pre-closing knowledge a buyer had or should have had. As a result, lawyers and their clients frequently choose to avoid wrangling over contractual terms associated with sandbagging for fear of blowing up a deal or spending inordinate time to reach agreement on this one problem.”

“Because transactional contracts often fail to address sandbagging, the post-closing resolution of sandbagging issues frequently hinges on applicable common law, and courts in different states have very different views about the proper resolution of these controversies. This makes the choice-of-law provision in transactional contracts extremely important.”

Read the article.




Former BigLaw Office Manager Accused of Using Firm’s Credit Card for Spending Spree

“Federal prosecutors allege that a former Morrison & Foerster office operations manager spent more than $400,000 on the firm’s credit card to make personal purchases and transfer money to his PayPal account.” reports Debra Cassens Weiss of the ABA Journal.

“The former employee, Andrew Robertson, faces a preliminary hearing at the end of the month in Washington, D.C., on a federal mail fraud charge.”

“Robertson is accused of spending money on personal purchases that included designer clothing, jewelry, home furnishings, groceries, his Verizon bill and storage units for his personal items.”

Read the article.




Women Suing Riot Games May Deserve $400 Million, Not $10 Million

“Two state agencies are taking the unusual step of trying to stop Riot Games from paying out $10 million to female employees as part of a settlement over a gender discrimination class action suit.” reports the Los Angeles Times. “The state thinks the women could be entitled to as much as $400 million instead.”

“The suit began in November 2018, when two women who had worked at the Los Angeles game studio, which makes the popular “League of Legends” title, sued over violations of the California Equal Pay Act, alleging they were routinely subjected to sexual harassment and gender discrimination.”

Read the Los Angeles Times article.




Johnson & Johnson’s $8 Billion Risperdal Judgment Reduced to $6.8 Million

“The judge presiding over a case which saw Johnson & Johnson hit with an $8bn jury verdict has reduced the amount the company has to pay in damages to $6.8m.” reports PM Live.

“Last October,  J&J was ordered to pay $8bn in damages to a US man who claims he was not warned that taking the company’s antipsychotic Risperdal could lead to breast growth.” A jury in Philidelphia agreed with his allegations.

Johnson & Johnson appealed the verdict arguing the size of the payout was “grossly disproportionate”.

 

Read PM Live‘s article.




Man Serving Life Gets New Trial After Attorney Described as Racist

The San Francisco Chronicle reports that an African American man serving a life term for a 1989 murder is entitle to a new trial says a federal appeals court. Ezzard Charles Ellis learned, “after his lawyer’s death, that the attorney was a racist who regularly expressed contempt for minority clients.”

“After San Bernardino attorney S. Donald Ames died in 1999, his daughter and others described incidents in which he used racial slurs to refer to nonwhites, particularly African Americans. ”

The “state attorney general’s office, which represented the prosecution in Ellis’ appeal, had agreed that the conviction should be reversed.”

Read the San Francisco Chronicle’s article.




Michael Avenatti Is Now Being Held in Same Chilly Cell That Housed El Chapo

Time reports that Michael Avenatti is “being imprisoned in the same chilly cell that once held drug kingpin El Chapo, his lawyer said.”

“Avenatti was put in the most secure section of the federal facility under special administrative measures designed to cut off his communications with the outside world, Srebnick said. The special housing unit has held dozens of terrorism defendants over the past quarter century.”

“His cell, reportedly once occupied by Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán, has an officer posted outside it around the clock and two cameras focused on him.”

Read the Time‘s article.




Trump’s lawyers began the impeachment trial with a blizzard of lies

“The opening debate of the Senate impeachment trial on Tuesday afternoon was supposed to be merely about the trial rules. But members of President Donald Trump’s legal team wasted no time telling a number of lies before things really got going.” reports Vox.

“Though getting facts wrong might be somewhat understandable in the context of extemporaneous statements, these falsehoods came in the context of prepared remarks read by White House counsel Pat Cipollone and personal Trump attorney Jay Sekulow.”

Read Vox‘s article.




HP Wins $439 Million As Judge Triples Jury Price-Fix Award

HP Inc. was awarded $439 million in damages against Quanta Storage Inc. and its U.S. subsidiary after a federal judge tripled a jury’s 2019 award for damages caused by a widespread scheme to inflate the price of optical disk drives, Bloomberg reports.

Sony, Panasonic and some other disk-drive makers settled with HP over the past decade. Only Taiwan-based Quanta chose to go to trial.

Quanta lost that trial in October when a Houston jury ordered Quanta to pay HP $176 million in damages. Now the federal judge in the case has tripled the damages award, as authorized under antitrust law, to $528 million before deducting $89 million in settlements paid by the other companies.

Read the Bloomberg article.

 

 




Another ‘Unsigned Agreement’ Held Enforceable Where the Parties Intended to be Bound, Despite Not Signing

Contract- signatureJames M. Wicks of Farrell Fritz writes about a recent breach of contract case in which a court found that an unsigned termination agreement between a real estate broker an another party was enforceable even though it never was signed.

He explains that the court focused its analysis on two questions: Is there evidence supporting a finding of an intent to be bound?, and if so, is there evidence that the parties “positive[ly] agree[d] that it should not be binding until so reduced to writing and formally executed”?

The ruling is a reminder that written agreements without the “not bound until signed or executed” clause is risky business, Wicks writes.

Read the article.