Compliance Investigations: Best Practices and Effectiveness Essentials

ComplianceHanzo will present a webinar on how to structure a robust investigation protocol to help compliance teams conduct investigations on a regular basis.

The webinar, “Compliance Investigations: Best Practices and Effectiveness Essentials,” will be May 17, 2019, at 2 p.m. Eastern time.

Tom Fox, the Compliance Evangelist and the author of The Compliance Handbook, and Michael Volkov, CEO of the Volkov Law Group, will be presenters.

The webinar will cover:

1) Why the intake of a hotline report is a critical start of your investigation protocol.

2) How to effectively set up a triage program for all internal and external reporting.

3) The different levels of investigations you should set up.

4) What type of report you should issue.

5) How and why you should protect the privilege.

Register for the webinar.

 

 

 

 




Elon Musk and SEC Make Deal: He’ll Have ‘Experienced Securities Lawyer’ Preapprove His Tweets

Elon Musk and the Securities and Exchange Commission have come to a settlement agreement over the Tesla CEO’s errant behavior on social media: All of Musk’s communication via social media, the company’s website, press releases, and investor calls must be preapproved by an “experienced securities lawyer.”

Musk got into trouble with the SEC earlier this year when he tweeted a projection about Tesla vehicle production that the agency considered to be misleading.

Business Insider reports that Musk must “implement mandatory procedures and controls” providing oversight of all of his communications regarding the company “made in any format.”

Read the Business Insider article.

 

 




Former Hertz General Counsel Rebuffs Demand for Clawback

Hertz Global Holdings has filed a lawsuit against its former general counsel and some other former managers after they refused to pay back at least $70 million in incentive compensation for their roles in an accounting scandal five years ago, reports The Global Legal Post.

The company accused the former executives of pressuring employees to use fraudulent accounting techniques to inflate income and earnings, according to a March 25 lawsuit.

Former general counsel Jeffrey Zimmerman has refused to return incentive compensation tied to the erroneous accounting results.

Read the Global Legal Post article.

 

 

 




Webinar: #MeToo is Transforming Corporate Governance

Berkeley Law professor Amelia Miazad will analyze how the #MeToo movement has impacted foundational aspects of corporate governance when Berkeley Boosts presents a free webinar on April 23, 2019, at 10 a.m. Pacific time. MCLE credit will be available.

Those aspects to be discussed include board composition, how the board oversees risk, CEO selection and compensation, and M&A deals.

Berkeley Boosts is a monthly series of free webinars (with MCLE credit) and articles for legal practitioners and organizational leaders. Berkeley Boosts content is curated by the Berkeley Center for Law and Business and Berkeley Law Executive Education.

Register for the webinar.

Past Berkeley Boosts webinars have covered a range of topics, including:

The Wild World of Class Actions
March 20, 2019
Presenters: David Singh, Partner and Hannah Jones, Associate at Weil

The Rise of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS)
February 26, 2019
Presenter: Mario Mancuso, Kirkland & Ellis (formerly Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security)

Blockchain Explained
January 22, 2019
Presenters: Ian Lee, IDEO CoLab, and Nancy Wojtas, Cooley LLP

To access recordings of these presentations, as well as receive notice of upcoming webinars, sign up for the mailing list.

 

 




Federal Judge Sets April 4 Hearing for Elon Musk Contempt Case

A federal judge in New York will hear oral arguments next week in a lawsuit brought by the US Securities and Exchange Commission that seeks to hold Tesla CEO Elon Musk in contempt for violating a settlement deal, according to a CNN report.

Judge Alison Nathan will consider the SEC’s request that Musk be held in contempt for violating a settlement agreement reached last year, which required he get pre-approval for social media posts about the electric car company, writes CNN’s Victoria Cavaliere.

Musk tweeted on Feb. 19 that Tesla would produce “around 500k [cars] in 2019.” Hours later, he posted a follow-up tweet indicating that the company will actually deliver just 400,000 cars this year.

Although Musk corrected his mistake, regulators said he had “once again published inaccurate and material information about Tesla to his over 24 million Twitter followers,” according to court papers.

Read the CNN article.

 

 




Event: Digital Transformation in Corporate Legal Departments

Computer technologyMorae Global and SimpleLegal will present a breakfast and a panel discussion offering a practical look at digital transformation in corporate legal departments.

The complimentary event will be Wednesday, April 3, 2019, 7:30-9 a.m. CDT, Wells Fargo Plaza, 1000 Louisiana Street, Ground Floor Auditorium, Houston, TX 77002.

Digital transformation has become a rallying cry for business and technology strategists, the sponsors said in a release. Unfortunately, only 19 percent of in-house legal teams are well positioned to support enterprise digital efforts (Gartner). This presents a great opportunity for legal departments to use new technologies to reduce operating costs, increase productivity, and deliver enhanced new services to their company and adhere to regulatory and compliance obligations.

The event will cover:

  • The Way We Work – Rethinking workflows and ensuring that the right people are doing the right work.
  • Transformative Use of Technology – Considering how to leverage digital technologies in transforming work, collaboration and business facilitation.
  • Use of Data Analytics – How businesses can identify previously unknown correlations among data to better predict outcomes, optimize delivery, mitigate risk, and tailor solutions to consumer demands and expectations.
  • Change Management and Adoption – Best practices on leveraging change management to assist in the successful digital transformation of the legal department.

The panel will consist of Russ Dempsey (AGC at AIG), Ben Chrisman (AGC at Gridliance) and Ryan Murphy (Director of Legal Operations at LyondellBasell).

Register for the event.

 

 




Implementing the New Revenue Recognition Standard – What Private Companies Need to Do Now

By Robert Miller, CPA, CFE
Samet & Company, PC

With the effective date for the new revenue standard fast approaching, many private companies have still not taken important steps towards implementation. Time is running out as the private company implementation date draws closer and some entities may be surprised to learn that the effort to implement the new model is more involved than they might have imagined.

In May 2014 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, codified as Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 606. This sweeping new revenue standard changes the entire model for recognizing revenues from arrangements with customers, introducing a new five-step model. The effective date for non-public entities is any fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2018.

Companies must consider and resolve important questions: What systems are in place to capture the new accounting, reporting and disclosure requirements? Are there customer arrangements that have a variable consideration component? Which of the two acceptable methods for calculating transaction price will be most appropriate? How will assessments be made to determine whether to recognize performance obligations at a point in time versus over time? What adoption method will be most appropriate? These are just some of the questions that must be considered by all entities as they implement the new revenue standard.

Auditors are also paying close attention to the implementation of ASC 606, and will themselves be focused on designing procedures to properly test the elements within the new revenue recognition model, in addition to implementation of the standard by their audit clients.

Companies will find that it is generally beneficial to have a preliminary discussion with their auditor regarding the approach in the first year of implementation and beyond. This will almost certainly eliminate certain potential surprises later on. Items that should be discussed include:

• The approach for documenting implementation of ASC 606, including the new five-step model
• The accuracy of any data used, and the approach for compiling that data to support first year reported amounts and disclosures
• The controls and process for ensuring that revenues are being properly captured and recognized under the new model
• Any assumptions by management and the supporting evidence or reasoning behind those assumptions
• Important management representations that are likely to be required

All entities within the scope of ASC 606 will need to develop a plan for implementation and document how they are applying the new standard, regardless of the level of impact. At a minimum, there are expanded disclosure requirements for all entities. Additionally, many entities that have already adopted ASC 606 found that changes to existing systems were necessary in many cases. An initial assessment of the impact of the new standard is critical to gain an understanding of what might be involved to implement.

So what should private companies who have not yet taken action do? Here are some important steps to follow:
• Designate a Champion – Identify and assign an individual to lead the implementation project
• Develop an Implementation Plan – A solid implementation plan should cover several areas, including technical accounting impact, processes and internal controls, IT and data needs, and training, among other areas
• Document – Document the application of the standard to specific types of customer contracts
• Make Changes to Systems – Implement any necessary system changes to ensure information necessary for proper reporting is captured and tracked
• Capture Information Necessary for Implementation – Complete any analyses and calculations needed to properly support amounts and disclosures on the date of adoption

An important first step is to contact your accounting firm. Your audit partner is often management’s best resource. An initial discussion about how the new ASC 606 model is likely to affect your business can be worth its weight in gold. While the clock continues to tick for many companies that have not yet begun the process of evaluating the impact of ASC 606, there is still time to avoid unwanted surprises. The key is to take that first step and reach out to your accounting firm or other advisor who has a solid understanding of the new standard and start the discussion about implementation.

Robert S. Miller, CPA, CFE, partner, Samet & Company, PC, Robertm@samet-cpa.com, 617-751-5395, www.sametcpa.com

 

 




Hospital System Fires General Counsel Amid Alleged Compliance Violations

The Broward Health board fired its general counsel Lynn Barrett as the Florida taxpayer-supported health system continues to struggle after a series of state and federal investigations related to alleged overspending, kickbacks and open-government law violations, reports Modern Healthcare.

“Broward Health doctors alleged during Wednesday’s board meeting that Barrett helped cultivate a hostile culture at the South Florida health system, which led to a ‘mass exodus’ of doctors that crippled the organization,” explains reporter Alex Kacik.

Barrett’s dismissal comes amid a controversy over an independent review process led by law firm Baker Donelson concerning a $69.5 million healthcare fraud settlement agreement reached in 2015.

Read the Modern Healthcare article.

 

 

 




Supreme Court Weighs Google Settlement That Paid Class Members Nothing

The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments this week on whether it should place limits on class-action settlements in which the plaintiffs’ lawyers receive millions and their clients get nothing, reports The New York Times.

“The case arose from an $8.5 million settlement between Google and class-action lawyers who said the company had violated its users’ privacy rights,” writes Times reporter Adam Liptak. “Under the settlement, the lawyers were paid more than $2 million, but members of the class received no money.”

As a part of the settlement, Google agreed to contribute to institutions concerned with privacy on the internet, including centers at Harvard, Stanford and Chicago-Kent College of Law, and AARP.

“How can you say that it makes any sense?” Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. asked a lawyer for the members of the class.

Read the NY Times article.

 

 




Zenefits CEO Parker Conrad Resigns Amid Scandal

Zenefits cofounder Parker Conrad resigned as CEO and as a director of the company, according to a Forbes report, as questions are being raised about the steps Conrad took to put Zenefits into hypergrowth – including flouting laws about who is allowed to sell insurance.

“COO David Sacks, formerly of PayPal, now steps into the CEO job at Zenefits,” the report says. “In an email sent to employees, he admitted the company has taken too many wrong steps. ‘We sell insurance in a highly regulated industry. In order to do that, we must be properly licensed. For us, compliance is like oxygen. Without it, we die,’ he wrote. ‘The fact is that many of our internal processes, controls, and actions around compliance have been inadequate, and some decisions have just been plain wrong. As a result, Parker has resigned.’”

Read the article.

 




Wells Fargo to Pay $1.2B Federal Mortgage Settlement

Wells Fargo has agreed to a $1.2 billion settlement to resolve a long-running mortgage dispute with the U.S. government, a move that slashes the bank’s 2015 profit by $134 million, reports The Charlotte News & Observer.

“The deal involves civil fraud claims brought in 2012 against the San Francisco-based bank, which the government had accused of ‘reckless’ underwriting practices that led to thousands of federally-insured loans defaulting,” according to the report. “The government said Wells Fargo’s false certifications that the loans met requirements for federal insurance resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars in insurance payouts.”

Read the article.

 

 




Home Health Provider Hit With $238,900 HIPAA Penalty

Lincare, a major provider of in-home respiratory care and other services, will pay $238,900 in civil monetary penalties for violating the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), federal authorities announced Wednesday, according to a report by Home Health Care News.

“This marks only the second time that the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) has imposed civil monetary penalties for a HIPAA violation. The penalty was challenged but now has been upheld by an administrate law judge (ALJ),” the report says.

The breach involved a Lincare branch in Wynne, Arkansas, doing business as United Medical. Faith Shaw worked as a manager there from 2005 until 2009. Shaw had stored records of 278 patients in her car, which she left behind when she moved out of her marital home in 2008. Her husband reported finding those records to the OCR.

Read the article.

 




Information Governance Hard to Achieve, Worth Effort to Protect Data

Information governance (IG) is nearly impossible to achieve but is a goal worth pursuing to protect the privacy of sensitive data and ensure organizations can meet discovery requests, according to a panel at the LegalTech show in New York.

Teri Robinson, associate editor of SC Magazine reported on the panel discussion.

“To create a legally defensible IG strategy, companies must understand where information resides as well as who has the data, how to get at it and how quickly legal can get at it during discovery,” she wrote.

Read the article.

 




The Five Top Compliance Related Events of 2015

Even though the number of Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) enforcement actions dropped during 2015, there were several significant lessons for the compliance practitioner not only to learn but also to put in place in any corporate anti-corruption compliance regime, writes Thomas Fox in FCPAComplianceReport.com.

He discusses some significant events that occurred last year that he believes portend some of the greatest changes not only to compliance but to FCPA enforcement going forward.

Those events are discussed under these headings: The Yates Memo, DOJ Compliance Counsel, First British DP, FIFA Corruption Scandal, and Volkswagen and the Zeitgeist of Compliance.

Read the article.