Why You Should Insist on Diversity in Your Law Practice

Suzie Scanlon Rabinowitz writes in the ABA Journal that “Both the perception of and reality for women attorneys is disheartening. According to the National Association for Law Placement, women accounted for 20% of equity law firm partners in 2018. That’s while women have constituted about half of law school graduates for the past 20 years, according to Catalyst, a nonprofit focused on advancing women’s professional progress. By many other key metrics, the law is still male-dominated, especially at its highest levels.”

“In a profession where cultural change happens at a creeping pace, how can we change the perception—and the reality—that success for women at the upper echelons is the exception, rather than the rule? Just as important, how can we elevate the practice of law by fostering diversity in the profession?”

Read the article.




Too Many Teenagers Want to Become Lawyers or Managers

“Teenagers aren’t being imaginative enough with their ambitions as they aspire to a short list of 20th-century occupations in their future careers, according to the OECD.” reports Carolynn Look in Bloomberg.

“Huge changes in the world of work — driven by developments in technology and social media — are having too little impact on the job expectations of young people, according to a report presented at the World Economic Forum in Davos by the Paris-based organization.”

“The report cited a survey of 15-year-olds showing that career ambitions narrowed in the last two decades. Roughly half of boys and girls from 41 countries said they expect to work in one of just 10 jobs by the age of 30. Such roles originate overwhelmingly from the 19th and 20th centuries, such as doctors, teachers, veterinarians, business managers, engineers, police officers, and lawyers.”

Read the Bloomberg article.




Why Partners Leave Law Firms: It’s Usually Not About Compensation

The 2020 Lateral Partner Satisfaction Survey, released by legal search firm Major, Lindsey & Africa, reveals that the top reason for law firm partners to make lateral moves is lack of confidence in firm management and strategy.

“The next most-often cited reasons were a lack of support to build their practice (about 35%), dislike of their firm’s culture (about 31%) and compensation (about 31%). The lawyers were allowed to choose more than one factor,” reports the  ABA Journal.

The survey also shows that many partners are making life-changing decisions with very little due diligence.

Read the survey.

Read the  ABA Journal‘s report.

 

 




Biglaw Firm Forms Mental Health Task Force

Mental HealthAbove the Law reports that Reed Smith has announced a global Mental Health Task Force to help Reed Smith’s team address mental health issues as they arise.

Partner Kimberly Gold, inaugural chair of the task force, describes the firm’s plan:

“The mission of this task force is to ensure that our lawyers and professional staff have access to help whenever they or their family members experience or are at risk of experiencing mental health or substance use issues. We will also challenge the well-documented stigma surrounding these issues and cultivate a workplace culture that promotes psychological wellness and positive help-seeking behaviors.”

Read the Above the Law article.

 

 




Chief Legal Officer at Google Parent Company Stepping Down Amid Investigation

David Drummond, the chief legal officer of Google’s parent company, Alphabet, and one of its most senior executives, is leaving the internet giant amid an investigation into his relationships with women who worked at the company, reports The New York Times.

His resignation comes more than a year after 20,000 Google employees protested the company’s handling of sexual harassment and inappropriate workplace relationships, writes the TimesDaisuke Wakabayashi.

“Some employees inside Google were dismayed that Mr. Drummond was not forced to leave after the details of an extramarital relationship he had with a woman who worked for him became public,” Wakabayashi continues. “The concerns about Mr. Drummond’s workplace romances took on new life when he recently married another woman from Google’s legal department.”

Read the  NY Times article.

 

 




How One Biglaw Firm’s ‘Partners in Name Only’ Live in Limbo

Bloomberg Law takes a look at the hundreds of Kirkland & Ellis hard-working, non-share partners who live in a sort of limbo—a solid step above associate status, but still well-short of achieving the coveted position of equity partner, where they are able to share in the firm’s largesse.

Bloomberg’s Roy Strom explains:

“It’s an exchange that helps fuel the bottom line at one of the world’s richest law firms: Kirkland gets non-share partners’ blood, sweat, and tears, and billable hours. And in return, non-share partners bank on the experience and contacts gained at Kirkland in hopes that despite the significant blow of not getting coveted Kirkland shares, they can land well elsewhere.”

Read the Bloomberg Law article.

 

 




Hiring? Being Hired? Uncovering the Fine Print.

“Clauses in employment contracts may appear benign when a contract is signed, but then later balloon into serious problems.” warns Devin R. Bates and Lauren Grinder in Mitchell Williams’ Between the Lines.

This article addresses several commonly litigated issues. They caution that “There is no one-size-fits-all solution for employment contracting, but it would be wise to heed the old adage that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.”

Read the article.




Ex-GC Sues Faraday & Future; Was Poached From Mayer Brown

The former general counsel of Faraday & Future Inc. sued the company for $106 million Jan. 3, according to a Bloomberg Law article.

Hong Liu, a China expert, claimed in Manhattan federal court that the electric car startup lured him away from a Mayer Brown LLP partnership by fraudulently overstating its prospects.

He alleges top executives made false claims about a pending $2 billion investment to persuade him to abandon his lucrative practice and move his family from New York to California. The investment didn’t materialize, and Liu alleges he was fired after less than a year without receiving the compensation he’d been promised: $6 million in cash and 20 million shares—valued at $100 million—in Faraday affiliate Smart King Ltd.

Read the Bloomberg article.

 

 




Apple General Counsel Adams Earned $25.2 Million in 2019

Bloomberg Law reports that Apple Inc. general counsel Katherine Adams earned more than $25.2 million in total compensation during 2019, down slightly from a year earlier, according to a preliminary proxy statement filed Jan. 3.

Adams receives $1 million in annual cash compensation, with the balance coming in the form of restricted stock awards in the company.

“Adams replaced the retiring Bruce Sewell as the company’s general counsel, having previously spent 14 years in-house at Honeywell International Inc., the last eight of which she served as its in-house legal chief,” writes Bloomberg’s Brian Baxter. “Before that Adams spent a decade at Sidley Austin, where she was an associate and partner.”

Read the Bloomberg Law article.

 

 




23 Tips for Drafting Employment Arbitration Agreements

Careful drafting of employment arbitration agreements due to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision affecting an employer’s ability to enforce such agreements is critical, warn Art Silbergel and Kacey Riccomini in a post on Thompson Coburn’s website.

The publication states “In the interim, employers and their counsel need to carefully consider options in drafting arbitration agreements that address the new law that may help in compelling a court complainant to arbitrate the claims. Anyone creating, revising or reviewing agreements to arbitrate employment disputes should consider” their 23 tips.

Read the article.




Physician Non-Compete Agreements Present Challenges, Potential Controversy

Doctor and patientWhen it comes to physician employment agreements, non-compete provisions can be controversial and tricky, warns A. Kevin Troutman in Fisher Phillips’ Non-Compete and Trade Secrets Blog.

Such provisions can “restrict a doctor from practicing in a specified geographic area for a stipulated period of time after termination of their employment,” he writes. “The key question is when do such provisions become unreasonable? The analysis becomes even more complicated when factoring in the unique bond between patients and their doctors. After all, most patients’ sense of loyalty lies with their physician, not with a particular hospital, clinic or medical group.”

Read the article.

 

 




Earn CLE at SCCE’s Internal Investigations Workshop

The Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics will present its Internal Investigations Workshop, January 22-24, 2020, in San Francisco.

The workshop provides two days of focused training on conducting compliance-related internal investigations. The domestic workshops also offer an optional third day post conference. Experienced compliance professionals who have in-depth experience in the challenges and opportunities in conducting internal investigations will lead the training.

Topics include:

  • Understanding and assessing the initial allegation of wrongdoing
  • Creating an investigation plan
  • Gathering evidence
  • Conducting interviews, including the subject of the investigation
  • Conclusions and root-cause analysis
  • Writing your report
  • Avoiding pitfalls and legal risks

Register for the event or get details.

 

 




Texas Litigation Powerhouse Smashes the Biglaw Bonus Scale

pay-salary-income-statisticsMore than 20 percent of associates at Texas-based litigation powerhouse Susman Godfrey will have total compensation of at least $500,000 for 2019, the firm announced.

Above the Law reports on the firm’s new scale:

“Susman has a history giving out massive bonuses. 2019 has brought another year of big bonuses at the firm. But they didn’t just repeat the big bonuses from last year, they actually added to them.”

Bonuses range as high as $235,000 for Susman Godfrey associates in the 2011 law school graduation class.

Read the Above the Law article.

 

 




Bed Bath & Beyond’s C-Suite Shake-Up Claims Longtime Legal Chief

Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.’s longtime general counsel Allan Rauch is among six senior executives departing the company as part of a corporate restructuring announced Dec. 17, reports Bloomberg Law.

The home goods retailer named a former subordinate of Rauch’s to succeed him as general counsel on an interim basis.

Bloomberg’s Brian Baxter writes that the new interim GC, Michael Callahan, is a former vice president and corporate counsel with more than 25 years of experience in the company’s law department.

Rauch joined the company in 1994 and became general counsel in 1996.

Read the Bloomberg Law article.

 

 




Webinar: Top 2020 Risk & Compliance Trends

A NAVEX Global webinar will address the top 10 risk and compliance trends for 2020.

The complimentary event will be Wednesday, Jan. 15. 2020, at 10 a.m. PT/1 p.m. ET.

In 2020, several critical issues are sure to impact the business landscape, including: election year turmoil, updates to regulatory requirements, digital environment impact, new agency guidance, data privacy, workplace behavioral shifts, and more, NAVEX says in its invitation.

Participants in the webinar will hear how experts are predicting these upcoming trends will provoke, shape and inspire organizational shifts and program improvements.

Register for the webinar.

 

 




The Importance of a Forum Selection Clause

A Davis Wright Tremaine post illustrates the application of a forum selection clause in a contract.

In Down-Lite International, Inc. v. Chad Altbaier, a federal magistrate judge denied defendant’s motion to transfer venue from Ohio to California largely because the parties’ forum selection clause designated Ohio as the venue for disputes.

Down-Lite’s holding illustrates that courts tend to enforce forum selection clauses unless there is a compelling showing of prejudice to the party opposing the agreed-upon forum, according to the post.

Read the article.

 

 




A Contractual Non-Disparagement Provision May Violate the National Labor Relations Act

While prohibiting disparagement of co-workers, products and services is lawful, prohibiting disparagement generally of the employer, management, or policies is not, according to a memo from the  National Labor Relations Board, the Office of General Counsel.

Fiona W. Ong discusses the memo in an article for Shaw Rosenthal.

The memo was in part a response to a law firm’s employee agreements that contained a provision prohibiting critical comments about the firm. Several former employees posted negative reviews about the firm on various websites, including Glassdoor.com, Indeed.com, Avvo, Yelp, and Yahoo.business. The law firm then filed suit against them for breach of contract and defamation.

Read the article.




Former GC Sues for $300K in Canceled Bonuses; Agency Countersues, Alleging Fraud

The Salt Lake Tribune reports that the Utah Transit Authority’s former general counsel is suing the agency for $300,000 in deferred bonuses and benefits that leaders had voided as “unconscionably high.”

The agency responded in state district court by counter-suing Bruce Jones, alleging “fraud and legal malpractice.”

Jones claims he negotiated for the bonuses in exchange for keeping his base salary lower. The agency claims Jones represented “both himself and UTA in salary negotiations” on contracts that gave him the generous benefits, which were never approved by the board.

Read the Tribune article.

 

 




Firm Beats the Biglaw Bonus Scale for All Associates

Money-payment-cashAssociates at Wilkinson Walsh + Eskovitz can thank management for setting a standard-breaking bonus scale for Biglaw associates, according to a report by Above the Law.

The firm, with offices in Washington, Los Angeles and New York, set a bonus scale that is 1.5 times the going market rate. Above the Law senior editor Staci Zaretsky writes that this is the fourth time the firm has beaten the market on bonuses since it opened four years ago.

Senior associates and those in the class of 2012 are in line for bonuses of $150,000.

Read the Above the Law article.

 

 




Sanctions Motion By BigLaw Firm Alleges Plaintiffs Made Up Pay-Bias Claims ‘Out of Whole Cloth’

Jones Day has filed a motion seeking sanctions against plaintiffs who filed a $200 million lawsuit alleging that the law firm discriminates based on gender and motherhood, reports the ABA Journal.

The firm alleges in the sanctions motion that the plaintiffs made up the lawsuit’s pay-bias claims “out of whole cloth” and seeks their dismissal, writes the Journal‘s Debra Cassens Weiss. Jones Day also is seeking an order for the plaintiffs’ lawyers to pay fees and costs that the firm spent to litigate the motion.

Jones Day has claimed that the plaintiffs in the original suit wrongly assumed that female associates at the firm were paid less than their male counterparts.

Read the  ABA Journal article.