Judge Blocks $54 Billion Anthem-Cigna Health Insurance Merger

A federal judge blocked the $54 billion merger between health insurance giants Anthem and Cigna, saying the deal would increase prices and reduce competition, according to a report by The Washington Post.

 is the second recent court decision to uphold the Justice Department’s opposition to deals that would have consolidated the five largest insurers in the United States into three companies.

“The evidence has also shown that the merger is likely to result in higher prices, and that it will have other anticompetitive effects: it will eliminate the two firms’ vigorous competition against each other for national accounts, reduce the number of national carriers available to respond to solicitations in the future, and diminish the prospects for innovation in the market,” U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson wrote in a 12-page order.

In the merger agreement, Anthem had agreed to pay Cigna a $1.85 billion termination fee if the deal is blocked because of regulatory interference.

Read the Washington Post article.

 

Join Our LinkedIn Group

 




Republican Plan Would Ease Wall St. Rules, As Party Embraces Deregulation

Bank sign

Image by Mark Moz

Jeb Hensarling, chairman of the U.S. House Financial Services Committee, outlined proposed legislation to clear away many rules bankers say have hobbled investment and economic growth in a staff memo reported by Reuters.

Hensarling’s plan would roll back Wall Street rules and consumer protections conceived after the 2008 financial crisis, a step that will largely define the financial deregulation debate in the Trump era.

“Under Hensarling’s plan, the largest U.S. banks would face less oversight — though not as little as they had been hoping for – while startups would have easier access to investors,” writes reporter Patrick Rucker.

Read the Reuters article.

 

 

 




Jury Awards Ousted General Counsel $8M

A federal jury awarded the former general counsel of BioRad Laboratories $8 million in back pay and damages — which will increase to $11 million — for whistleblower retaliation involving potential bribery in China, according to a Courthouse News article.

Sanford “Sandy” Wadler won $2.96 million for economic losses and $5 million in punitive damages. Because the Dodd-Frank Act allows double back pay damages for whistleblower retaliation, the back pay award will increase to $5.92 million, bringing the total to nearly $11 million, explains reporter Nicholas Iovino.

Wadler sued Hercules, California-based BioRad Laboratories and its CEO Norman Schwartz in May 2015. He alleged he was fired in June 2013 for reporting potential bribery in China, a violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

This case implicates a number of key issues confronting companies and their in-house legal teams, including:  (1) protections and scope of the attorney-client privilege; (2) what constitutes protected activity from an in-house attorney or compliance officer; (3) the importance of consistent and timely performance critiques; and (4) preparing adverse employment decisions to be scrutinized by a judge, jury, or arbitrator.  The case also highlights the existing split among federal courts regarding what constitutes a “whistleblower” under the DFA.

Read the Courthouse News article.

Read the Jackson Lewis blog item.

 

Join Our LinkedIn Group

 




Akin Gump Lawyer Accused of Trying to Sell Lawsuit Under Seal

HandcuffsA Washington lawyer at a prominent firm was arrested in a disguise while trying to sell a copy of a secret lawsuit involving a company that was under investigation by the U.S. Justice Department, Bloomberg Law is reporting.

Jeffrey Wertkin immediately lost his job with Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP after he was picked up Jan. 31 in the lobby of a hotel in Cupertino, California. The FBI said he believed he was about to collect $310,000 for selling the lawsuit.

Wertkin believed he would hand a copy of a complaint to an employee of the company, which was accused in the complaint by a whistle-blower of falsely billing the government, report Bloomberg’s Jef Feeley, David Voreacos and Joel Rosenblatt.

That employee turned out to be an FBI agent, according to arrest documents unsealed on Feb. 6.

Read the Bloomberg article.

 

Join Our LinkedIn Group

 




Download: Bringing E-Discovery In House

ZapprovedZapproved has published a new white paper successfully transitioning from outsourced to in-house e-discovery. The paper is available for free downloading from the company’s website.

Corporate counsel face constant pressure to do more with less, Zapproved says on its site. As data stores have ballooned, and as the cost of litigation and compliance investigations has grown, more organizations are looking for ways to lower the cost of e-discovery.

Three in-house legal professionals provide insight for this new In-House Elevated white paper.

Panelists Jack Thompson of Sanofi, Becki Bottemiller of  Portland General Electric, and Wendy Riggs of Twitter, Inc. discussed with Jennifer Bantelman of Zapproved, Inc. their thoughts about the benefits of insourcing the discovery process, how to plan for the transition, where to start, how to choose the most helpful technology, what model will work best, and what pitfalls to avoid.

Download the white paper.

 

 




Commercial Contract Risk in 2017

With international and domestic supply chain contracts, there is little or no room for error. according to an article posted by a team of lawyers at Foley & Lardner LLP.

“While some supply chain contracts incorporate negotiated provisions in the form of a letter agreement or long-term agreement, many supply chain contracts rely on standard purchase order terms and conditions. This can result in contracts of considerable value and corresponding high risk receiving  little attention from in-house or outside counsel,” they write.

They offer advice on how to manage supply chain contract risk, supply chain contracting in light of regulatory changes, and international contracting.

Read the article.

 

Join Our LinkedIn Group

 




Uber CEO to Leave Trump Advisory Council After Criticism

Image by Adam Tinworth

Uber CEO Travis Kalanick responded to an onslaught of criticism to his joining President Trump’s economic advisory council by resigning from the council on Thursday, reports The New York Times.

The criticism came both from people outside the company and from Uber employees, explains reporter Mike Issac.

First, the company took heat from the public after the company appeared to be profiting from business generated during New York protests of Trump’s immigration order. Then Kalanick had to face direct criticism from his employees, who wondered why he was willing to advise the president.

“Outside of the internal pressure, Uber faced other fallout from Mr. Kalanick’s stance. More than 200,000 customers had deleted their accounts,” Issac writes.

Read the Times article.

 

 




Invitation: General Counsel to Discuss Cost Control

Bloomberg Big Law Business and CatalystBloomberg Big Law Business, in partnership with Catalyst, will convene corporate counsel to discuss the need to control rising legal costs particularly related to litigation at the complimentary event, Controlling Litigation Costs – Managing Your Legal Department for Success.

The event will be Thursday, Feb. 23, 2017, 3-5:30 p.m. Central time, at University Club of Chicago, Northwestern Room, 76 E Monroe St., Chicago, IL 60603.

Technology provides important solutions, but only if implemented effectively and as part of an overall strategy to manage litigation, Bloomberg says on its website. Top general counsel will talk about the ways they are managing litigation and the expectations they set with law firms and technology vendors.

Corporate counsel speakers include:

  • Susan Lees, Executive Vice President & General Counsel, Allstate Insurance
  • Leslie McKnew, VP, Litigation, CISCO
  • Matt Miller, VP, Deputy General Counsel – EMEA, APAC and Global Litigation, Groupon
  • Sharyn Procaccio, Vice President and Assistant General Counsel, Hunt Companies

Register for the event.

 

Join Our LinkedIn Group

 




Management Needs to Own Core Programs

By Patty P. Tehrani
Lawyer and Founder of Policy Patty Toolkit

So much focus right now on the new administration in place. Not to mention the rampant speculation about what they will do about various financial regulations and how dramatically this landscape is expected to change. As if this were not enough, your company has a new Chief Executive Officer (CEO). She has requested a meeting with you, the General Counsel, to meet to discuss your ethics, risk and compliance programs to learn more about them. She also wants to get your insights on what she and management should do to avoid the common pitfalls highlighted in recent corporate scandals.

As an experienced lawyer, this is welcome news. You know that a company’s governance, risk and compliance programs (“core programs”) should be promoted by management to truly be effective. You are all too familiar with recent headlines regarding the lack of management focus on a company’s core programs resulting in poor company culture and irreparable systemic failures. Often these scandals involve management that has delegated ownership for their company programs and most definitely ignorant to the risks and issues involving them. Most end up with dire consequences – share price plummets, employees lose morale and leave, customers leave, and overall the brand and reputation diminish. And while your company’s prior management did a good job to promote your core programs more can still be done.

This article provides key considerations to help you prepare for your meeting with your CEO.

Note: You can define management however you deem fit for your company. This can include boards of directors where appropriate and your business leaders such as the chief executive officer, president, chief financial officer, the heads of product/business lines as well regional divisions for global companies.

Preparing for Your Meeting

You decide that the focus of your meeting will be on management ownership of your core programs. To prepare for your meeting, you want to make an outline of discussion points. As a starting point, you want to note what ownership does not mean, which can be delegated to the subject matter experts. That is – the development, implementation, and maintenance of a core program which can be delegated to the subject matter experts – Legal, Risk or Compliance departments (as well as others). Next and most importantly, you list how management can own these programs. In doing so, you want to make sure that you underscore the benefits. To help your discussion consider the following points:

• Tone at the Top – Management should set an effective “Tone-at-the-top” to communicate their commitment to core programs and to promote the need for them.

  • Formal and documented adoption of a program (e.g., notice from management to all employees that they have approved a core program).
  • Regular communication from management on a program (e.g., management messages on your programs via training, company websites, inclusion in town halls, or periodic reminders on program requirements to name a few).

• Embed in the Business and Culture – Management should lead efforts to incorporate program requirements and risks into the company’s overall business strategy, processes, and operations. Taking an integrated approach will lead to better overall performance and ultimately your bottom line by avoiding different and possibly conflicting business and control requirements.

  • Unintegrated program risks and vulnerabilities may affect the ability of a company to fulfill its business strategies and objectives.
  • Failed or deficient programs may result in costly disruptions to core business activities leading to harmful breakdowns in business operations and ultimately the company’s viability.
  • Jeopardizing the company’s continuity and integrity increases the potential for reputational damage — in the market, among shareholders, and with business partners.

In addition, a core program should not be viewed in isolation of a company’s core values, mission, and culture. Management should align a core program with a company’s core values, mission, and culture to reap tangible benefits.

  • A strong program provides important benefits including safeguards for weak or absent controls, and integral to an open environment of trust, accountability, and integrity – all ingredients that benefit productivity and the bottom line.
  • While every company is unique, there are a few universal program outcomes/objectives that it every company would benefit from:
    • an enhanced culture of trust, accountability, and integrity;
    • process for prevention, detection, and management of issues;
    • protection (to the extent possible) from negative consequences, and detection of non-compliance;
    • defined escalation measures for non-compliance and material issues; and

• Accountability – Management should foster a culture of accountability to help the success of a core program. Accountability requires management to know what the material issues are with a core program and how to act on them promptly.

  • Escalation – A defined escalation process to alert management is critical to management accountability. This is particularly important when the company is getting close to (or crossing) a risk or challenge that prevents the achievement of a material program objective or deliverable or runs afoul of a legal, regulatory or business requirement.
  • Monitoring – Program processes and results should be monitored and measured on a regular basis. If done properly, monitoring measures keep regulators happy during reviews, but more importantly keep management informed and accountable.

Robust monitoring and reporting results can be used to:

  • facilitate management response to program issues and challenges;
  • help company’s gauge progress of objectives and how they are contributing to the success of the company’s strategy;
  • improve program components from time-to-time; and
  • prevent, detect, and respond to identified malfeasance in the future.

Note: Be mindful of matters that may warrant referral or reporting to the relevant governmental agency or regulator following presentation to management.

o Access – Management should ensure key areas have access to them to ensure timely, proper and informed responses to program issues.

  • Key program administrators and messengers – Legal, Compliance, Risk Management, Operations, Human Resources, Audit, Information Technology – need unrestricted access to management to help them respond to the issue/challenge.
  • Responsibility – Management should also be prepared to go so far as to take the blame for a material failure involving a core program. Consider when a company CEO publicly acknowledges responsibility for a company failure, everyone takes notice – employees, investors, business partners and industry regulators.
  • Support – Management should support program leaders and administrators so that they have the authority and sufficient resources to: 1) manage a program on a day-to-day basis; and 2) maintain them in the event of regulatory and operational changes, varying and possibly increasing risks.

You’ve drawn your outline together and ready to discuss with your CEO. You know that by working together, management and program administrators can help ensure a core program not only contributes to the improvement of the company’s governance practices but the success of its company’s strategy as well.

Join Our LinkedIn Group

 




NACD Webinar: How Progressive GC Use Board Evaluation

board of directors - conference tableThe National Association of Corporate Directors will present a complimentary webinar discussing how progressive general counsel use the board evaluation process as a tool to effect positive change in the boardroom.

The webinar is part of NACD’s Strategic-Asset General Counsel Webinar Series.

The event will be March 23, 2017, 2-3 p.m. Eastern time.

Board evaluation will be the main topic for the NACD webinar.

Speakers will be announced closer to the event date.

Register for the webinar.

 




IRS Rolls Out New Compliance Campaigns for Large Businesses

Banking - taxes - moneyThe Internal Revenue Service’s Large Business and International division is taking a new approach to tax compliance, with a series of 13 campaigns aimed at cracking down on tax evasion, reports Accounting Today.

Reporter Michael Cohn writes that the IRS division is moving toward issue-based examinations and a compliance campaign process in which it decides which compliance issues present enough of a risk that they require a response.

Those responses, known as “treatment streams,” could include examinations and letters to achieve the IRS’s tax compliance objectives, leveraging IRS expertise in various compliance issues, Cohn explains.

Some of the areas considered will be tax credits for advanced energy projects, people who withdraw from or are denied entry to the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program, TV broadcasters and channels who claim film production tax credits for distributing shows produced by third parties, and micro captive insurance.

Read the Accounting Today article.

 

Join Our LinkedIn Group

 

 




GC from Major Companies Join NACD’s First GC Steering Committee

The National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD), the advocate for the profession of directorship, announced the formation of its first-ever General Counsel Steering Committee. As part of NACD’s goal to equip boards with the information they need to create long-term value for businesses, this invitation-only committee brings together more than 60 progressive general counsel — all nominated by Fortune 500 board committee chairs.

The members of the steering committee will directly shape and inform NACD’s brand-new initiative, The Strategic-Asset GC, which includes resources, a webinar series, and a live meeting on June 1, 2017, in New York City. This initiative is designed to explore the continuing evolution of the role of the general counsel and its impact on boardroom issues, and will help to form leading governance practices as well as NACD resources and additional educational programming.

“The formation of this initiative and committee couldn’t be more timely,” said Peter Gleason, the recently appointed CEO of NACD. “Our members turn to general counsel now more than ever before for their unique legal and strategic perspective. In fact, almost two-thirds of our full board members have their general counsel on their membership roster.”

NACD’s General Counsel Steering Committee members come from a diverse range of Fortune 500, nonprofit, and private companies. GC are from such companies as Foot Locker, Campbell Soup, Hanesbrands, General Motors, and Lockheed Martin.

See a list of the committee members.

 

Join Our LinkedIn Group

 




Tech Industry Reacts to Trump’s Order on Immigration With Fear and Frustration

Passports - immigrationDonald Trump’s executive order Friday banning citizens of certain countries from entering the U.S. for 90 days blindsided the technology industry, reports The Los Angeles Times.

Reporter Tracey Lien writes that the industry had thought that its main battle on the immigration front was over the number of H-1B visas — granted to high-skilled foreign workers — that will be made available each year.

But now lawyers are fielding calls from worried tech workers with visas and green cards. And they’re having to adjust their advice to those clients as each day’s news comes out.

“For those abroad, we are telling them to come back as soon as possible, and be prepared to face questioning and possible refusal,” Los Angeles immigration attorney Ayda Akalin said.

Read the Los Angeles Times article.

 

Join Our LinkedIn Group

 




Download: 2017 Strategic E-Discovery Insights and Best Practices

Zapproved has published the proceedings catalog from the 2016 PREX, the premier conference for in-house e-discovery professionals. The catalog is available for free downloading.

The volume includes reflections shared by participants and faculty about the ongoing challenge of sustainably managing and preserving data to meet e-discovery demands.

It includes a recap of the fireside chat with Hon. Shira Scheindlin led by attorney and professor Maura Grossman; roadmaps for creating the perfect preservation notice and plan; strategies for improving e-discovery process and compliance; and predictions about the future of legal software and its impact on e-discovery. The content also covers the panel review where six judges summed up 10 cases and their key “takeaways” from each one in an hour.

Download the PREX catalog.

 

Join Our LinkedIn Group

 




Mark Zuckerberg, in Suit, Testifies in Oculus Intellectual Property Trial

Photo by Brian Solis

Mark Zuckerberg, chief executive of Facebook, testified Tuesday in a trial that could cost his company $2 billion if a federal jury in Dallas finds that a company bought by Facebook stole technology that eventually went into a virtual reality headset.

New York Times report on the trial says the “dispute started more than two and a half years ago when ZeniMax Media sued Oculus just months after Facebook announced that it would acquire the start-up. ZeniMax accused Oculus of stealing important elements of the technology that went into the creation of the headset, eventually including Facebook among the parties it was suing.”

Reporters Nick Wingfield and Mike Issac write that this case defied predictions by reaching a jury trial.

ZeniMax’s case is based on the idea that one of its former employeesshared ZeniMax virtual reality technology with a founder of Oculus, during the company’s early days, technology for which ZeniMax was never compensated, according to the report.

Read the NYT article.

 

 




Takata to Pay $1 Bln to Settle U.S. Air Bag Probe – Sources

Reuters is reporting that Japan’s Takata Corp is expected to plead guilty to criminal wrongdoing as Friday as part of a $1 billion settlement with the U.S. Justice Department over its handling of air bag ruptures linked to 16 deaths worldwide, sources said.

David Shepardson writes that the settlement includes a $25 million criminal fine and $125 million in victim compensation. He added that his sources told him the settlement also will include  $850 million to compensate automakers who have suffered losses from massive recalls.

“The company is poised to plead guilty to wire fraud, or providing false test data to U.S. regulators, according to the sources, who were not authorized to discuss the settlement publicly,” according to the report.

Read the Reuters article.

 

Join Our LinkedIn Group

 

 




Trial Lawyer Jay Old Joins Texas-based Hicks Thomas LLP

Jay OldVeteran trial lawyer Jay Old has joined commercial litigation firm Hicks Thomas LLP where he will continue to represent construction, insurance, petrochemical and health care companies as part of his client portfolio.

Old’s addition will add offices in Austin and Beaumont. Old joined the firm effective Jan. 1.

“We are thrilled to be adding Jay and his team. He’s an exceptional lawyer with an outstanding track record,” said John B. Thomas, name partner and firm co-founder. “Many of us have known Jay for years, dating back to our days together at Andrews Kurth.”

Old’s clients include refineries, construction contractors, manufacturers, hospital systems and insurers. Joining him is labor and employment lawyer Jim Henges, along with four other lawyers from Old’s firm.

“I like to say I represent the job creators,” Old said. “I’m very excited to be joining the Hicks Thomas team, and hope to add to its reputation as a premier trial firm.”

Old is a frequent speaker at continuing education programs for lawyers across the country. He also is a former president of the Texas Association of Defense Counsel and has chaired the Construction Law Section of the State Bar of Texas.

He has defended national clients in statewide and regional mass tort litigation, in toxic torts, construction and product liability cases. He also successfully defended insurance companies in a series of high-profile trials involving hailstorm claims in Galveston and elsewhere.

Old is Board Certified in Personal Injury Trial Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and has been recognized on the Texas Super Lawyers list every year since 2005. A native of Beaumont, he is a graduate of Texas A&M University and the Texas Tech University School of Law.

 

Join Our LinkedIn Group

 




2017: An Evolving Landscape for Third Party Risk Management – Webinar

Navex Global will present a free webinar discussing how a new administration and anticipated enforcement and regulatory changes will impact third party due diligence programs.

The event will be Thursday, Jan. 26, at 1 p.m. EST (10 a.m. PST).

Topics will include:

  • Potential impacts of the Trump administration on compliance
  • Changes to FCPA enforcement approaches
  • Disgorgement trends
  • Yates Memo impacts
  • Upcoming regulatory changes

Participants also will techniques and technology to help mitigate political and regulatory turmoil with a risk-based approach to modernizing due diligence.

Speakers will be Michael Volkov, CEO, Volkov Law Group, LLC; and Tim Morss & Chris Bailey, of NAVEX Global.

Register for the webinar.

 

Join Our LinkedIn Group

 

 




Download: Eight Practices to Oversee Risk Effectively

Risk managementThe National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) has published a complimentary executive summary of “Eight Key Practices for Overseeing Risk Management.”

“As the number and magnitude of business risks increase, so do the expectations for stronger risk oversight — through both greater board awareness of risk and more disciplined board review of enterprise-risk management,” the NACD says on its website.

The reports offers key practices that all directors can use to oversee risk more effectively, such as:

  • Clarify the roles of the board, committees, and management.
  • Understand the company’s risk profile.
  • Define the company’s risk appetite.

Download the executive summary.

 

 




The Major Potential Impact of a Corporate Tax Overhaul

Taxes - IRS - Internal Revenue ServiceWith the U.S. House, Senate and presidency all soon to be in Republican hands and with all agreeing that a major tax bill is a top priority, some kind of change to the American taxation system appears likely to happen, according to The New York Times.

Writer Neil Irwin says that change may turn out to be “a very big deal, particularly if a tax plan that House Republicans proposed last summer becomes the core of new legislation.”

That plan is known as a “destination-based cash flow tax with border adjustment.” Supporters of the plan say it could address the situation of companies using overseas holding companies and corporate inversions to lower taxes, Irwin writes.

Read the NYT article.

 

Join Our LinkedIn Group