Yahoo’s Top Lawyer Resigns, CEO Marissa Mayer Loses Bonus in Wake of Hack

Yahoo’s top lawyer, Ronald S. Bell, has resigned, and its chief executive, Marissa Mayer, lost her 2016 bonus after a board investigation of the 2014 theft of information on more than 500 million user accounts, reports The New York Times.

“Senior executives, company lawyers and information security staff were aware of the hack in 2014 and also knew about subsequent attempts to break into the affected accounts in 2015 and 2016, but failed to ‘properly comprehend or investigate’ the situation, the company’s board of directors said in a securities filing on Wednesday,” writes reporter Vindu Goel.

Yahoo’s GC is bearing much of the blame for the company’s security failures, including the hack that left up to 32 million Yahoo accounts vulnerable. The company now faces 43 consumer class-action suits related to breaches, as well as a stockholder class-action suit, the report says.

Read the NYT article.

 

Join Our LinkedIn Group




Is Your Board Prepared to Oversee Cyber Risk?

NACDThe National Association of Corporate Directors has published the 2017 edition of the NACD Director’s Handbook on Cyber-Risk Oversight and made it available for free downloading.

The book is constructed around five core principles designed to enhance the cyber literacy and cyber-risk oversight capabilities of directors of organizations of all sizes and in all industries, according to NACD.

This handbook provides

  • foundational principles for board-level cyber-risk oversight;
  • insight into management of cyber-risk oversight responsibilities; and
  • tools to improve and enhance boardroom practices.

Download the handbook.

 

 




Digital Disruption – Impacts for Corporate Legal Departments

Kim Technologies will present a seminar titled “Digital Disruption – Impacts for Corporate Legal Departments” on March 21, 2017 for corporate counsel and executives.

The complimentary event will be at Columbia University’s main campus in New York City, beginning with a buffet breakfast at 8:30 a.m. The main program will be from 9 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.

Dr. Art Langer, director of Columbia University’s Center for Technology Management, will discuss digital disruption in the 21st Century.

Bjarne Tellman, SVP and general counsel of Fortune 100 company Pearson PLC, will discuss the vision for a transformed legal service.

Karl Chapman, CEO of Riverview Law, will talk about moving from a technology-enabled to technology-led legal service delivery model.

And Susan Hackett, LEL, former SVP and GC of Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC), will host a moderated discussion involving in-house counsel.

Register for the seminar.

 

 




Bio-Rad to Pony Up $3.5m in Legal Fees for Ex-GC/Whistleblower

Bio-Rad Laboratories has agreed to pay $3.5 million in legal fees for the team that represented former general counsel Sanford Wadler during a whistleblower retaliation lawsuit Wadler brought against his former employer, reports MassDevice.com.

The agreement came after a federal jury in California awarded Wadler $11 million in the lawsuit he brought against Bio-Rad. The jury awarded Wadler $2.9 million in back pay and stocks and $5 million in punitive damages, with the back pay award slated to be doubled, bringing the total award to $10.8 million, reports .

“Wadler, who was fired in 2013, alleged that he was let go right before the company was planning to present findings from a bribery investigation in Russia, Thailand and Vietnam. Wadler accused the company of stonewalling his efforts to uncover evidence of similar bribery in China,” Faulkner writes.

Writing about the case on the website of Baker Donelson, shareholder Robert E. Hauberg Jr. explains that the court had ruled Wadler could use as evidence otherwise privileged materials, because the Sarbanes-Oxley Act’s protection of whistleblowers pre-empted the attorney-client privilege. (See “Whistleblower General Counsel Prevails Through Use Of Attorney-Client Privileged Information.”)

Read the MassDevice.com article.

 

Join Our LinkedIn Group

 




Corporate Risk Management 2017 – 4 Key Trends

CybersecurityA webinar featuring the chief operating officer of Interfor International will discuss corporate security as it continues to evolve in a growing and complex matrix of threats and responsibilities.

The webinar will be Thursday, March 2, at 2 p.m. EST.

Don Aviv, CPP, PSP, PCI, Chief Operating Officer, Interfor International, will take a look at the 2017 security landscape and explore four trends central to delivering quality corporate safety and security.

During the webinar, he will discuss:

1. Successfully deploy corporate security systems:
2. Improving workplace violence awareness and response
3. Protecting the lone employee and duty of care responsibility
4. Enhancing global employee communication and location awarenesscu

Register for the webinar.

 

 




HP GC to Law Firms: Meet Diversity Mandate or Forfeit Up to 10% of Fees

Diversity - employmentThe general counsel of HP has informed its outside law firms that the company may withhold up to 10 percent of invoiced fees for failure to meet its diversity standards, reports the ABA Journal.

HP Chief Legal Officer and General Counsel Kim M. Rivera put law firms on notice of her “diversity holdback” mandate in a Feb. 8 letter.

The Journal‘s Debra Cassens Weiss writes, “HP says its definition of a diverse lawyer ‘is limited to race/ethnicity, gender, LGBT status, and disability status.’ A lawyer who is both a woman and who is racially/ethnically diverse and performs or manages at least 10 percent of the billable hours worked on HP matters satisfies the minimal diversity staffing requirement.”

Read the ABA Journal article.

 

Join Our LinkedIn Group

 




Data Processing Benchmark Report Reveals the Next Big Trends

Zapproved Zapproved has published its new 2017 In-House E-Discovery Data Processing Benchmark Report, detailing the most satisfying and concerning aspects affecting data processing for e-discovery.

These insights can offer a roadmap to create better, more efficient data processing and review approaches in the year ahead, the company said on its website.

Each year, Zapproved produces a report on the the state of in-house e-discovery, based on a short survey. Participants include a range of in-house e-discovery professionals, from IT personnel to legal operations staff. The 2017 In-House E-Discovery Data Processing Benchmark Report reveals participant satisfaction with data processing speed, cost, ease of use, security and risk reduction. These attributes are correlated with business criteria, such as case types, matter sizes, data sources and future trends.

The resulting report illustrates what really impacts data processing decisions today and how to plan for the future.

It covers:

  • What most influences speed, cost, ease of use, security and risk reduction
  • When to use in-house versus external solutions
  • Why spending more in-house can make sense
  • Which data sources are the next big trend

Download the study findings.

 

 




Invitation: General Counsel to Discuss Cost Control

Bloomberg Big Law Business and CatalystBloomberg Big Law Business, in partnership with Catalyst, will convene corporate counsel to discuss the need to control rising legal costs particularly related to litigation at the complimentary event, Controlling Litigation Costs – Managing Your Legal Department for Success.

The event will be Thursday, Feb. 23, 2017, 3-5:30 p.m. Central time, at University Club of Chicago, Northwestern Room, 76 E Monroe St., Chicago, IL 60603.

Technology provides important solutions, but only if implemented effectively and as part of an overall strategy to manage litigation, Bloomberg says on its website. Top general counsel will talk about the ways they are managing litigation and the expectations they set with law firms and technology vendors.

Corporate counsel speakers include:

  • Susan Lees, Executive Vice President & General Counsel, Allstate Insurance
  • Leslie McKnew, VP, Litigation, CISCO
  • Matt Miller, VP, Deputy General Counsel – EMEA, APAC and Global Litigation, Groupon
  • Sharyn Procaccio, Vice President and Assistant General Counsel, Hunt Companies

Register for the event.

 

Join Our LinkedIn Group

 




Management Needs to Own Core Programs

By Patty P. Tehrani
Lawyer and Founder of Policy Patty Toolkit

So much focus right now on the new administration in place. Not to mention the rampant speculation about what they will do about various financial regulations and how dramatically this landscape is expected to change. As if this were not enough, your company has a new Chief Executive Officer (CEO). She has requested a meeting with you, the General Counsel, to meet to discuss your ethics, risk and compliance programs to learn more about them. She also wants to get your insights on what she and management should do to avoid the common pitfalls highlighted in recent corporate scandals.

As an experienced lawyer, this is welcome news. You know that a company’s governance, risk and compliance programs (“core programs”) should be promoted by management to truly be effective. You are all too familiar with recent headlines regarding the lack of management focus on a company’s core programs resulting in poor company culture and irreparable systemic failures. Often these scandals involve management that has delegated ownership for their company programs and most definitely ignorant to the risks and issues involving them. Most end up with dire consequences – share price plummets, employees lose morale and leave, customers leave, and overall the brand and reputation diminish. And while your company’s prior management did a good job to promote your core programs more can still be done.

This article provides key considerations to help you prepare for your meeting with your CEO.

Note: You can define management however you deem fit for your company. This can include boards of directors where appropriate and your business leaders such as the chief executive officer, president, chief financial officer, the heads of product/business lines as well regional divisions for global companies.

Preparing for Your Meeting

You decide that the focus of your meeting will be on management ownership of your core programs. To prepare for your meeting, you want to make an outline of discussion points. As a starting point, you want to note what ownership does not mean, which can be delegated to the subject matter experts. That is – the development, implementation, and maintenance of a core program which can be delegated to the subject matter experts – Legal, Risk or Compliance departments (as well as others). Next and most importantly, you list how management can own these programs. In doing so, you want to make sure that you underscore the benefits. To help your discussion consider the following points:

• Tone at the Top – Management should set an effective “Tone-at-the-top” to communicate their commitment to core programs and to promote the need for them.

  • Formal and documented adoption of a program (e.g., notice from management to all employees that they have approved a core program).
  • Regular communication from management on a program (e.g., management messages on your programs via training, company websites, inclusion in town halls, or periodic reminders on program requirements to name a few).

• Embed in the Business and Culture – Management should lead efforts to incorporate program requirements and risks into the company’s overall business strategy, processes, and operations. Taking an integrated approach will lead to better overall performance and ultimately your bottom line by avoiding different and possibly conflicting business and control requirements.

  • Unintegrated program risks and vulnerabilities may affect the ability of a company to fulfill its business strategies and objectives.
  • Failed or deficient programs may result in costly disruptions to core business activities leading to harmful breakdowns in business operations and ultimately the company’s viability.
  • Jeopardizing the company’s continuity and integrity increases the potential for reputational damage — in the market, among shareholders, and with business partners.

In addition, a core program should not be viewed in isolation of a company’s core values, mission, and culture. Management should align a core program with a company’s core values, mission, and culture to reap tangible benefits.

  • A strong program provides important benefits including safeguards for weak or absent controls, and integral to an open environment of trust, accountability, and integrity – all ingredients that benefit productivity and the bottom line.
  • While every company is unique, there are a few universal program outcomes/objectives that it every company would benefit from:
    • an enhanced culture of trust, accountability, and integrity;
    • process for prevention, detection, and management of issues;
    • protection (to the extent possible) from negative consequences, and detection of non-compliance;
    • defined escalation measures for non-compliance and material issues; and

• Accountability – Management should foster a culture of accountability to help the success of a core program. Accountability requires management to know what the material issues are with a core program and how to act on them promptly.

  • Escalation – A defined escalation process to alert management is critical to management accountability. This is particularly important when the company is getting close to (or crossing) a risk or challenge that prevents the achievement of a material program objective or deliverable or runs afoul of a legal, regulatory or business requirement.
  • Monitoring – Program processes and results should be monitored and measured on a regular basis. If done properly, monitoring measures keep regulators happy during reviews, but more importantly keep management informed and accountable.

Robust monitoring and reporting results can be used to:

  • facilitate management response to program issues and challenges;
  • help company’s gauge progress of objectives and how they are contributing to the success of the company’s strategy;
  • improve program components from time-to-time; and
  • prevent, detect, and respond to identified malfeasance in the future.

Note: Be mindful of matters that may warrant referral or reporting to the relevant governmental agency or regulator following presentation to management.

o Access – Management should ensure key areas have access to them to ensure timely, proper and informed responses to program issues.

  • Key program administrators and messengers – Legal, Compliance, Risk Management, Operations, Human Resources, Audit, Information Technology – need unrestricted access to management to help them respond to the issue/challenge.
  • Responsibility – Management should also be prepared to go so far as to take the blame for a material failure involving a core program. Consider when a company CEO publicly acknowledges responsibility for a company failure, everyone takes notice – employees, investors, business partners and industry regulators.
  • Support – Management should support program leaders and administrators so that they have the authority and sufficient resources to: 1) manage a program on a day-to-day basis; and 2) maintain them in the event of regulatory and operational changes, varying and possibly increasing risks.

You’ve drawn your outline together and ready to discuss with your CEO. You know that by working together, management and program administrators can help ensure a core program not only contributes to the improvement of the company’s governance practices but the success of its company’s strategy as well.

Join Our LinkedIn Group

 




NACD Webinar: How Progressive GC Use Board Evaluation

board of directors - conference tableThe National Association of Corporate Directors will present a complimentary webinar discussing how progressive general counsel use the board evaluation process as a tool to effect positive change in the boardroom.

The webinar is part of NACD’s Strategic-Asset General Counsel Webinar Series.

The event will be March 23, 2017, 2-3 p.m. Eastern time.

Board evaluation will be the main topic for the NACD webinar.

Speakers will be announced closer to the event date.

Register for the webinar.

 




GC from Major Companies Join NACD’s First GC Steering Committee

The National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD), the advocate for the profession of directorship, announced the formation of its first-ever General Counsel Steering Committee. As part of NACD’s goal to equip boards with the information they need to create long-term value for businesses, this invitation-only committee brings together more than 60 progressive general counsel — all nominated by Fortune 500 board committee chairs.

The members of the steering committee will directly shape and inform NACD’s brand-new initiative, The Strategic-Asset GC, which includes resources, a webinar series, and a live meeting on June 1, 2017, in New York City. This initiative is designed to explore the continuing evolution of the role of the general counsel and its impact on boardroom issues, and will help to form leading governance practices as well as NACD resources and additional educational programming.

“The formation of this initiative and committee couldn’t be more timely,” said Peter Gleason, the recently appointed CEO of NACD. “Our members turn to general counsel now more than ever before for their unique legal and strategic perspective. In fact, almost two-thirds of our full board members have their general counsel on their membership roster.”

NACD’s General Counsel Steering Committee members come from a diverse range of Fortune 500, nonprofit, and private companies. GC are from such companies as Foot Locker, Campbell Soup, Hanesbrands, General Motors, and Lockheed Martin.

See a list of the committee members.

 

Join Our LinkedIn Group

 




Reduce Risk in Finance, Contract & Employment Law: ACC Mid-Year Meeting

ACCThe Association of Corporate Counsel, the world’s largest community of in-house counsel, will stage the ACC Mid-Year Meeting in New York on April 2-4, 2017.

The event will be at the New York Marriott Marquis Hotel. General Counsel News readers may receive a $200 discount on the registration fee if they register by Feb. 20.

An ACC release says the meeting will help participants prepare for changes in the regulatory landscape with sessions on:

  • The impact of evolving regulations and enforcement trends on contracts
  • Current and most controversial changes in employment law
  • Reducing financial sector regulatory risk

Other activities will include:

  • Engage directly with expert faculty
  • Connect with your peers through multiple networking opportunities
  • Have the opportunity to earn 12-14 CLE/CPD (1 credit Ethics eligible), 14 CCB CEU credits, and 3-4 CPE credits

Register for the meeting.

 

 




Download: 2017 Strategic E-Discovery Insights and Best Practices

Zapproved has published the proceedings catalog from the 2016 PREX, the premier conference for in-house e-discovery professionals. The catalog is available for free downloading.

The volume includes reflections shared by participants and faculty about the ongoing challenge of sustainably managing and preserving data to meet e-discovery demands.

It includes a recap of the fireside chat with Hon. Shira Scheindlin led by attorney and professor Maura Grossman; roadmaps for creating the perfect preservation notice and plan; strategies for improving e-discovery process and compliance; and predictions about the future of legal software and its impact on e-discovery. The content also covers the panel review where six judges summed up 10 cases and their key “takeaways” from each one in an hour.

Download the PREX catalog.

 

Join Our LinkedIn Group

 




2017: An Evolving Landscape for Third Party Risk Management – Webinar

Navex Global will present a free webinar discussing how a new administration and anticipated enforcement and regulatory changes will impact third party due diligence programs.

The event will be Thursday, Jan. 26, at 1 p.m. EST (10 a.m. PST).

Topics will include:

  • Potential impacts of the Trump administration on compliance
  • Changes to FCPA enforcement approaches
  • Disgorgement trends
  • Yates Memo impacts
  • Upcoming regulatory changes

Participants also will techniques and technology to help mitigate political and regulatory turmoil with a risk-based approach to modernizing due diligence.

Speakers will be Michael Volkov, CEO, Volkov Law Group, LLC; and Tim Morss & Chris Bailey, of NAVEX Global.

Register for the webinar.

 

Join Our LinkedIn Group

 

 




Dallas’ Bailey Brauer Named Among Nation’s Most Feared Law Firms

Most feared law firmsBTI Consulting Group’s 2017 ranking of U.S. law firms that corporate lawyers never want to face in court includes Dallas’ Bailey Brauer PLLC based on the firm’s successful work in high-stakes litigation across the nation.

In a news release, the firm, founded in 2013 by former big firm lawyers Clayton Bailey and Alex Brauer, said it has successfully represented major corporations, family-owned businesses and high-net-worth individuals in a variety of business disputes by relying on years of expertise trying and appealing cases and negotiating favorable settlements.

“It’s a point of pride to be on this impressive list,” says Bailey, who is widely recognized for his work in state and federal trials and appeals. “General counsel call on Bailey Brauer because we provide the experience and quality they expect while keeping a close eye on the bottom line.”

Read more about the award.

 

Join Our LinkedIn Group

 




Download: Eight Practices to Oversee Risk Effectively

Risk managementThe National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) has published a complimentary executive summary of “Eight Key Practices for Overseeing Risk Management.”

“As the number and magnitude of business risks increase, so do the expectations for stronger risk oversight — through both greater board awareness of risk and more disciplined board review of enterprise-risk management,” the NACD says on its website.

The reports offers key practices that all directors can use to oversee risk more effectively, such as:

  • Clarify the roles of the board, committees, and management.
  • Understand the company’s risk profile.
  • Define the company’s risk appetite.

Download the executive summary.

 

 




Artificial Intelligence in Contract Management: Considerations for Practitioners

Artificial Intelligence - AIThere is perhaps no area where the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) systems (i.e., systems that exhibit intelligent behavior) will be felt more than in legal departments and, more broadly, in the area of managing contracts, according to an article in Spend Matters.

“Every commercial contract is like a little knowledge base that contains critical data on organizational commitments (usually legal obligations), rights, remedies and rules that reflect business decisions made in the past that will affect performance in the future,” writes Pierre Mitchell. “Unfortunately, the amassed collection of thousands of these artifacts does not provide a ‘collective intelligence’ that can be used efficiently to reduce commercial risks and increase economic value for the firm.”

In this first part of a series, Mitchell discusses three basic steps for building commercial intelligence.

Read the article.

 

 




On-Demand: E-Discovery Benchmark Survey Insights Revealed

General Counsel News and Zapproved have posted a complimentary on-demand webinar titled “Trends in Corporate E-Discovery Data Processing: Benchmark Survey Insights Revealed.”

An expert panel will explore the trends, and discuss the results of the 2017 benchmark survey.

The event provides insights and analysis on:

  • In-sourcing vs. outsourcing e-discovery projects
  • Satisfaction of process with an eye on factors such as time, cost and ease
  • Technology trends affecting how in-house legal teams’ work evolves in 2017 and beyond

Corena Bahr

Speakers were Brad Harris, VP of Products, Zapproved, Inc.; Jack Thompson, Sr. Manager – eDiscovery & Legal Operations, Sanofi US; and Brad Ellis, Corporate VP of Legal Services, Physician Acquisitions, Asst General Counsel – Scripps Health.

The moderator was Corena Bahr, Webinar Consultant & Producer, YourWebinarGuru.

Brad Harris

Brad Harris has more than 30 years of experience in the high technology and enterprise software sectors, including assisting Fortune 1000 companies enhance their e-discovery preparedness through technology and process improvement. He is a frequent author and speaker on data preservation and e-discovery issues, including articles in National Law Journal, Corporate Counsel, Metropolitan Corporate Counsel and Information Management and presentations at leading industry events such as LegalTech New York. Prior to joining Zapproved, he led the development of electronic discovery readiness consulting efforts for Fios, Inc. from 2004 to 2009. He has held senior management positions at prominent public and privately held companies, including Hewlett-Packard, Tektronix and Merant.

Jack Thompson

Jack Thompson is a corporate eDiscovery and Legal Operations professional, specializing in the advancement of efficiency of legal technical operations and information governance.  From 2001 through 2014, He was legal operations manager at Purdue Pharma LP in Stamford, CT providing services and solutions to Purdue’s legal technology operations as well as leading the company’s legal analytics programs.  In 2014, Thompson relocated to Atlanta, GA to work as the legal technology manager for the UPS Corporate Legal Department, followed by working as an IT Business Services Manager for The Coca Cola Company’s global legal department providing technical expertise and process workflow implementations.  Heis currently working as the eDiscovery Manager and Legal Operations Lead for Sanofi US, located in Bridgewater, NJ.

Brad Ellis

Brad Ellis received both his Juris Doctorate and a Master of Law in Taxation from the University of San Diego School of Law. He has 25 years experience in healthcare law, and has worked at Scripps Health for the last 18 years. Prior to joining Scripps Health he was in private practice with a focus in healthcare and the banking industries. In addition to his legal duties, he is responsible for physician acquisition in a business role, and is also responsible for system-wide cyber-security for the Scripps Health system.

See the on-demand webinar.

 

Join Our LinkedIn Group

 




Report Finds Corporations Will Decrease Use of Outside Legal Counsel in 2017

Corporate legal departments will decrease spend on outside counsel and take more work in-house in 2017, reveals a new report released by Liquid Litigation Management, Inc. (LLM), a legal workflow unification platform provider. “The State of the Legal Industry” report explores the motivations for technology adoption among U.S. law firms and corporations. It also examines the business benefits firms and their clients expect from technology adoption, as well as the lingering challenges they face.

While the corporations and law firms surveyed said their number one goal of incorporating technology is to boost efficiency, the way they use this new technology can prove counterproductive. The survey found that 64 percent of law firms rely on more than four distinct legal software systems to aid in developing strategy, tracking case management, and collecting, processing and reviewing data. This outsized number of systems, which can lead to inefficiencies and increased cost, is one example of why corporations think law firms are not as efficient as they should be. As a result, corporations are taking more work in-house and spending less on outside help.

“The law firms and GC offices participating in the survey show some interesting similarities and differences,” said Cas Campaigne, Chief Executive Officer and President of LLM. “Both are heavily focused on cost-cutting and efficiency gains, but their priorities differ. If law firms and corporations can work together to figure out how to consolidate their technology and reduce some of these inefficiencies caused by the complexity of systems they use, firms will be better equipped to meet the demands of their customers and corporations will save money.”

Some of the reports other key findings include the following:

• Corporations and law firms want greater budgeting predictability
• Corporations are using Alternative Fee Arrangements (AFAs) to reduce legal costs
• Nearly half of firms only use email to track communication around budget and strategy for historical purposes

“Doing ‘more with less’ is a mantra of many modern law departments. They are starting to demand similar discipline from their external providers,” said Casey Flaherty, former in-house counsel and founder of Procertas. “Talking about efficiency in the abstract isn’t enough. Corporations want measurable efficiencies and tractable savings without compromising quality. Many law firms struggle to meet these mandates. Buying technology is different from using technology is different from using technology well. Interoperability and integration are among the primary challenges we have in making our tools really work for us.”

The report provides other insights of particular interest to the legal community, such as:

• The most significant changes firms and GC offices anticipate in the coming months
• Their biggest obstacles
• How frequently firms communicate with their clients
• The ways in which corporations and firms want to use tech to improve operating efficiencies
• The degree to which legal departments and law firms leverage historical data and why
• The impact of AFAs on technology purchases
• The relative ability for firms and clients to keep pace with change

Download the report.

Join Our LinkedIn Group

 




GE Creates ‘Yelp for Lawyers’ to Assess Outside Law Firms

General Electric has developed what it’s calling a Yelp for lawyers, reports Bloomberg Law.

The report says the internal website allows the company’s approximately 800 in-house lawyers to search “preferred providers” of outside counsel and learn about their track record with the company.

“Titled GE Select Connect, more than 200 of the company’s outside law firms maintain profiles (à la Facebook) that feature firm information, including feedback the outside firms have received from GE lawyers, the firm’s diversity staffing levels, hourly rates, along and discounts the company has previously achieved,” Bloomberg reports.

Read the Bloomberg article.

 

Join Our LinkedIn Group