Only months after the Environmental Protection Agency first contacted thousands of oil and gas companies demanding detailed information regarding methane releases from gas production facilities and related equipment, it has announced that the companies are “no longer required to respond,” reports Akin Gump in its AG Deal Diary.

in 2016 the EPA announced that it planned to send requests for information to approximately 15,000 oil and gas companies involved in onshore production, gathering and boosting, gas processing, transmission, storage and liquefied natural gas import/export. The agency wanted the information to “help the agency determine how best to address methane emissions from the oil and gas industry, including through rulemaking to reduce emissions.”

Now the EPA has announced: ““EPA has withdrawn the 2016 information request for the oil and gas industry, effective immediately. If you received a letter requiring you to fill out a survey, you are no longer required to respond.”

Akin Gump’s David H. Quigley, Christine B. LaFollette and Charles L. Franklin wrote the article.

Read the article.

Join Our LinkedIn Group

The House is poised to pass three bills this week championed by industry that may tilt the civil litigation process in favor of business in thousands of cases each year, reports Bloomberg BNA.

The far-reaching bills address class actions, asbestos cases and attorneys who file “frivolous” suits, writes Bruce Kaufman.

The fast-track approach is deemed essential to give the bills time to advance in the more-deliberative Senate, where 60 votes are needed to overcome an almost certain filibuster.

The bill rewrites class-action practice, aids defendants striving to keep cases out of plaintiff-friendly state courts, punishes attorneys who file dubious claims, and seek to put new limits on settlements entered into by the Department of Justice and the EPA. They also would require more disclosures by asbestos victims who seek compensation from bankruptcy trusts.

Read the Bloomberg article.

Join Our LinkedIn Group

Reuters is reporting that Chinese telecom equipment maker ZTE Corp has agreed to pay $892 million and plead guilty to criminal charges for violating U.S. laws that restrict the sale of American-made technology to Iran and North Korea.

“A five-year investigation found ZTE conspired to evade U.S. embargoes by buying U.S. components, incorporating them into ZTE equipment and illegally shipping them to Iran,” explains reporter Karen Freifeld. “In addition, it was charged in connection with 283 shipments of telecommunications equipment to North Korea.”

“With this action, we are putting the world on notice. Improper trade games are over with,” Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross told reporters Tuesday. According to a CNBC report, he called ZTE’s actions “a brazen disregard for our laws.”

Read the Reuters article.

Join Our LinkedIn Group

Image by firedoglakedotcom

Reuters is reporting that a U.S. Justice Department probe into a phony accounts scandal at Wells Fargo & Co. is asking whether executives hid details from the company board and regulators as the problem grew over years, sources familiar with the review said.

Patrick Rucker reports that the move could result in criminal charges against bank employees involved.

“Officials are seeking to find out if executives shared everything they knew about the phony accounts to the Wells Fargo board of directors and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the lead regulator for national banks,” Rucker reports. “Even if executives are not charged with criminal misconduct, they could face civil penalties including fines or a ban from the banking industry. Wells has already fired some executives and clawed back portions of their pay.”

Read the Reuters article.

Join Our LinkedIn Group

Image by NY Photographic

Companies looking to waive class action rights of employees may instead be waving goodbye to provisions in their employment contracts, warns David Heck in Proskauer Rose’s Minding Your Business blog.

He discusses two recent decisions in California — one administrative and one in the 9th Circuit — that recently found that class action waivers in employment contracts were unenforceable as a matter of law and public policy, resulting in the removal of entire or partial contractual provisions.

“Together, these rulings make clear that class action waivers in employment agreements are subject to a high level of scrutiny, even if such waivers are not explicit and signing of the agreement was voluntary,” Heck writes.

Read the article.

Join Our LinkedIn Group

Bloomberg BNA is reporting that a package of far-reaching bills to overhaul the civil litigation process, long cherished by business and derided by consumer groups, is likely to win approval from President Trump if it reaches his desk.

Republicans are moving a batch of business-friendly bills through the House. An example is legislation calling for business-backed litigation measures, colloquially known as “tort reform.” Sherman “Tiger” Joyce, president of the American Tort Reform Association, told Bloomberg BNA that prospects for enactment fo the legislation are “certainly better than they’ve been since 2008.”

But backers of such legislation caution against reading too much into Trump’s comments on the bills, writes reporter Bruce Kaufman.

Read the Bloomberg article.

Join Our LinkedIn Group

Worker’s rights opinions written by Judge Neil Gorsuch, President Donald Trump’s pick for the Supreme Court, are often sympathetic but coldly pragmatic, and they’re usually in the employer’s favor, according to a review conducted by the Associated Press.

“A review of dozens of employment cases he heard in his decade on the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals reveals a focus on texts and a fondness for scrutinizing definitions of words in legislation and the Constitution. Conservatives herald his strict approach. Many liberals say it too often results in workers losing out,” write AP reporters Denise Lavoie and Michael Tarm.

The federal appeals court judge has sided with employers 21 out of 23 times in disputes over the U.S. pensions and benefits law, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, or ERISA. He sided with the majorty in all 21 cases.

Read the AP article.

Image by Chris Potter

The U.S. Treasury Department said it will extend its search for criminals who seek to launder money by buying U.S. real estate, according to a Reuters report.

The U.S. Treasury Department Financial Crimes Enforcement Network has had in place a rule that ordered  title insurance companies to report to authorities all-cash purchases in parts of California, Texas, Florida and New York.

“The agency said since imposing the original order in January 2016, it has found 30 percent of these cash real estate transactions involve a person who had previously been reported to authorities for suspicious financial activities,” Reuters reports.

The extension will keep the rule in place for a further 180 days.

Read the Reuters article.

Join Our LinkedIn Group

Image by Gage Skidmore

A group of law professors from around the country has filed a professional misconduct complaint against White House counselor Kellyanne Conway, a graduate of George Washington University Law School who was admitted to the D.C. Bar in 1995, reports The Washington Post.

In their letter, the professors wrote that Conway should be sanctioned for violating government ethics rules and “conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.”

“The 15 professors, who specialize in legal ethics, cite several incidents, including a television interview in which Conway made the ‘false statement that President Barack Obama had “banned” Iraqi refugees from coming into the United States for six months following the “Bowling Green Massacre,” ’ and the use of her position to endorse Ivanka Trump products,” writes Sari Horwitz.

Read the Washington Post article.

Join Our LinkedIn Group

Image by Images Money

The generic drug industry has come under fire the last couple of years because of staggering price increases, but now generic drug executives can expect to face tougher legal repercussions, reports MedCity News.

The efforts come in the wake of a 500 percent hike in the generic price of the EpiPen and the 5,400 percent jumpin the price of Daraprim for the treatment of potentially deadly parasite infections, writes Johanna Mayer.

In November 2016, Heritage Pharmaceuticals Inc. sued two of its former executives, Jeffrey Glazer and Jason Malek, using the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). And in December 20 states sued six companies, including Heritage, after a major antitrust investigation by the state of Connecticut.

“Experts predict that these diverse types of lawsuits could ignite a legal domino effect,” Mayer writes. “They also suspect that, as cases like these develop, they’ll expand to touch multiple prongs of the pharmaceutical industry, such as wholesale manufacturers and pharmacies.”

Read the MedCity News article.

Join Our LinkedIn Group

Despite what President Trump promised about simplifying the tax code when he was on the campaign trail, tax simplification isn’t a simple task, writes Charles Delafuente of The New York Times.

In his article, Delafuente writes, “It is unlikely that changes in the tax code would affect tax returns that must be filed this year, which cover last year’s income and deductions.”

He discusses major items that are under discussion in Washington and that may affect tax returns, including tax rates, itemized deductions, mortgage interest and real estate deductions, filing status, standard deduction, personal exemptions, carried interest, dependent-care deductions, and many more.

Read the NYT article.

Comprehensive due diligence review of any target company that performs government contracts should include evaluation of five broad categories relating to general business matters, Kimi Murakami writes in Part II of a report on Piliero Mazza‘s PM Legal Minute blog.

She discusses key issues to be considered when performing due diligence in M&A transactions for government contractors.

The topics include entity formation basics. registrations and permits, employee related matters, intellectual property related matters, and financial and other business related matters.

Read the article.

Read Part I.

Join Our LinkedIn Group

A bill in the Texas House seeks to end regulations that require nurse practitioners to contract with doctors in order to treat and write prescriptions. The proposal, HB1415, would give nurse practitioners (NPs) in Texas the freedom and flexibility they have been seeking for decades, reports Androvett Legal Media & Marketing.

It also would cut costs for both patients and providers, according to attorney Bill Hopkins of the Austin office of Shackelford, Bowen, McKinley & Norton, LLP.

“From the start, there has been a fundamental tension between their role and the role of the physician in the health care setting,” says Hopkins, who advises both individual and institutional health care providers on matters involving administrative law, regulatory defense and litigation. “No one has ever questioned that the physician is at the top of the pyramid. But over the years there has been some question as to whether there was some room at the top for the nurse practitioner who can drastically improve access to care.”

Currently NPs must complete four years of nursing school and two years in a graduate-level training program. Although they are regulated by both the Texas Board of Nursing and the Texas Medical Board, regulations require a doctor to supervise – even if the physician is not physically present and does not even see the patient, says Hopkins. Similar regulations have been rolled back in other states, with no evidence of increased safety issues, he says, adding that in some studies, nurse practitioner safety has ranked as high or higher than doctor care.

“For many years, NPs have argued that their knowledge, ability and training were more than sufficient to allow them to practice independently, care for patients and ensure safety,” he says. “The justification for charging NPs for this ‘supervision’ traditionally has been that it is a necessary cost to ensure patient safety. But thanks to the Affordable Care Act, there are more people with insurance than ever before and access has become a primary concern. With the safety argument becoming less relevant and calls for better access getting louder, it looks like this may be the time for NPs to finally get the independence that they have sought.”

Join Our LinkedIn Group

Dentons has published the latest edition of its “Government Contracts Legislative and Regulatory Update,” a summary of the relevant changes that took place during January.

Highlights of the report include:

• President Trump orders regulatory freeze pending review
• President Trump’s executive actions and their impacts on the government contracting community
• FAR Council issues final rule prohibiting contracting with firms that require confidentiality agreements restricting disclosure of fraud or abuse

Read the article.

Join Our LinkedIn Group

Healthlaw Publishing announces the upcoming release of Healthcare and the False Claims Act, 2016 Survey. Registration is available now for free downloading of the survey report.

Healthcare and the False Claims Act, 2016 Survey summarizes the important laws, regulations, pronouncements, and cases of the past year, to inform healthcare providers and healthcare attorneys on this crucial statute in the healthcare industry.

On Dec. 14, 2016, the United States Department of Justice announced the recovery of more than $4.7 billion in False Claims Act (“FCA”) settlements and judgments. It was the third-highest total in history, and more than $2.5 billion came from the healthcare industry. During the eight years of the Obama Administration, the Department of Justice recovered more than $31 billion in FCA settlements and judgments, taking more than $19.3 billion from healthcare providers and other participants in the healthcare industry.

2016 was a pivotal year for the FCA. It was the year of a tremendously important Supreme Court decision that could expose healthcare providers to whole new areas of FCA liability based upon state and federal regulations. The penalties were more than doubled to a minimum of more than $11,000 per claim and a maximum of more than $22,000 per claim, massively increasing both the risk of litigation and the likelihood of settling FCA cases even in the absence of wrongdoing. And it saw a new focus on the investigation and even the criminal indictment of individuals involved with entities sued under the FCA. 2016 also saw new regulations and new court interpretations of laws first put in place in 2009 and 2010 to turbocharge the FCA and encourage greater participation by whistleblowers.

Download the survey report.

Join Our LinkedIn Group

A client alert from Cowan Liebowitz & Latman discusses two recent developments conveying similar messages regarding the need to maintain supporting evidence at both the trademark application and registration stages.

According to the report by William M. Borchard and Vanessa P. Costantini, “if you file an application alleging an intention to use the mark in commerce, you may be required to support that allegation if it is challenged in an opposition, cancellation or infringement proceeding.”

They added that the United States Patent and Trademark Office may now require proof of the actual use of the mark in connection with all of the goods and services listed in the trademark application or registration.

Read the article.

Join Our LinkedIn Group

Navex Global will present a complimentary webinar titled “Managing Workplace Harassment: Trends and Objectives under the New Administration” on Wednesday, Feb. 22. The event will begin at 9 a.m. Pacific time/noon Eastern time.

On its website, Navex says incidents of prejudice and discrimination are increasing in today’s polarized society—including harassment in the workplace. How do you mitigate this risk while tensions continue to flare?

Join this webinar to hear:

• What actions constitute discrimination in the workplace
• How to manage workplace harassment
• Appropriate disciplinary measures

Navex also will share strategies for developing training plans for all levels of employment to minimize and avoid workplace harassment from the top down.

Register for the webinar.

Join Our LinkedIn Group

Some of the  potential benefits of the U.S. House would give companies more incentive to keep jobs in the United States and less to overextend themselves on borrowed money, points out The New York Times.

And there could be big vast savings by reducing what companies spend on tax lawyers, who help them game the current system, writes Neil Irwin.

“Yet these changes could also set off a cascade of more harmful effects. The plan could shift trillions of dollars of wealth from Americans to foreigners; set off an emerging markets financial crisis; wreak havoc in global oil markets; and cause sustained harm to the American higher education and tourism industries (including, as it happens, luxury hotels with President Trump’s name on them),” Irwin writes.

He goes on to discuss effects on the value of the U.S. dollar by the proposed destination-based cash flow tax and its “border adjustment.”

Read the NYT article.

Join Our LinkedIn Group

Tolling agreements are a common feature of the energy industry. Through these agreements, a buyer will supply fuel to an electric generator and, in return, the generator will provide power back to the buyer, according to an article posted on the website of Hogan Lovells.

But a court recent ruled that such a tolling agreement, when entered into between companies that intended to merge, violated the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, leading to the imposition of significant financial penalties against the buyer.

“Parties that have or may have an interest in acquiring the other party to the agreement must be careful to avoid assuming beneficial ownership of the target before complying with the HSR Act’s reporting requirements if HSR notification would be required,” the article says. “Failure to do so may result in the tolling agreement being construed as evidence of gun-jumping and the acquiring person being subject to significant penalties of up to $40,654 per day for noncompliance.”

Read the article.

Join Our LinkedIn Group

Image by Daniella Urdinlaiz

The only large U.S. law firm in the country dedicated solely to immigration work is in crisis management mode in the wake of President Donald Trump’s immigration order, reports Bloomberg Law.

Blake Chisam, chief audit and privacy officer at Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy, said the firm has started using two telephone briefings every day to alert partners about administrative issues, news updates, unsettled legal issues and upcoming risks. The firm has about 550 lawyers across the world, many of them gathering information as the situation unfolds.

The report says “Fragomen has helped clients draft letters to their board, briefed upset executives for meetings with the President, and even sued the Trump administration on behalf of a CNN journalist detained at the Atlanta airport. The firm’s attorneys have also jumped in on a pro bono basis to help travelers, visa and green card holders facing deportation and uncertainty.”

Read the Bloomberg article.

Join Our LinkedIn Group