Texas Supreme Court Acts on Two Significant Oil and Gas Cases

“The Texas Supreme Court denied a petition in one case and granted a petition in the other, both dealing with provisions in oil and gas leases,” reports John McFarland in Oil and Gas Lawyer Blog.

“The Court denied Chesapeake’s petition in Chesapeake v. Bell, construing an express drainage offset clause in Bell’s lease. The San Antonio Court of Appeals’ decision in favor of Bell stands – for now. The case goes back to the trial court for trial on the merits.”

“The Supreme Court granted Endeavor Energy’s petition for review in Endeavor Energy Resources v. Energen Resources, No. 18-1187, dealing with a continuous drilling provision in a lease retained acreage clause.”

“Endeavor owned an oil and gas lease on 11,303 acres of land in Howard County from John Thomas Quinn. The retained acreage clause allowed the lessee to retain all acreage after the primary term as long as no more than 150 days elapse between the completion of one well and the commencement of the next well. Endeavor drilled 12 wells, but then waited 300 days to spud the next well. Quinn then leased the acreage not earned by Endeavor’s 12 wells to Energen. This suit ensued.”

Read the full article.




Steven Carlotto Joins Cyber Defense Labs as General Counsel

“Cyber Defense Labs, a full lifecycle information security service provider helping companies manage, detect and respond to today’s cyber risks, has named Steven Carlotto as General Counsel and member of the company’s executive leadership team. In this role, Mr. Carlotto will oversee all corporate legal affairs and serve as a counselor and advisor to the company’s senior leaders and Board,” reported by Cyber Defense Labs Cision PR Newswire.

“Mr. Carlotto served 26 years in the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), earning extensive legal and compliance experience along with deep knowledge and unique insights around critical national security issues involving cybersecurity, counterterrorism and counterintelligence. Carlotto entered the FBI as a Special Agent in 1989. He worked in several important field offices including San Diego, New York and Newark in addition to FBI Headquarters in Washington, D.C.”

Read the press release.




What Is a Juridical Entity?

“When you organize a company, the language may be English, but the jargon sounds ‘foreign’ like you are playing a card from Dungeons and Dragons for an invincibility cloak. Wading through the lingo, one particular term you may encounter is ‘juridical entity,'” is discussed in IncNow’s blog.

“While ‘juridical’ simply means ‘legal’, knowing the characteristics of a juridical entity is helpful to know. Juridical entities are created by each state’s law to give a basket of rights normally associated with humans to non-human business entities. The law also gives rights that are often associated with property to the business entities, such as alienable ownership (the ability to sell/transfer ownership in the company).”

Read the article.




10 Best Practices for Digital Contract Transformation

“With the vast majority of CEOs expecting their business models to change over the next three years, it’s no surprise that digital transformation (DX) continues to be a strategic priority for organizations of all industries and sizes. But what does DX mean for legal teams and what is their role in the execution of it?” asks David Parks in Legal Reader’s Business.

“A big part of that answer is centered around the concept of digital contract transformation (DCX). DCX is all about the digitization of contracts and contract lifecycle management (CLM) processes. DCX is a foundational element of an organization’s broader digital transformation strategy because it not only modernizes their contracting efforts, it enables them to harness the data in their contracts to deliver actionable business insights which is the heart of digital transformation.”

Parks discusses ten best practices that legal teams can implement to help achieve a successful digital contract transformation.

Read the article.




Exculpatory Agreements: Mitigating COVID-19 Related Risks as the Economy Reopens

“Stores, restaurants, bars, and other customer-facing business owners are in various stages of reopening around the country and facing a patchwork of regulations and recommendations for dealing with the ongoing pandemic.  Many are rightly concerned about liability to customers based on exposure to COVID-19,” discuss Damon Suden and William Pierotti in Kelley Drye’s Client Advisory.

“Exculpatory agreements are contracts whereby one party waives their right to sue the other party on certain grounds, negligence for example. While every business should ensure that they are taking the responsible and appropriate steps necessary to protect their patrons, under the right circumstances the use of these agreements could provide some much needed protection.  Exculpatory agreements may not be appropriate for every business, but for businesses that can and wish to use them, they can help minimize risk in a time of high risk and great uncertainty.  Pairing these agreements with an arbitration clause or class action waiver could further fortify a business against expensive litigation as they navigate rebuilding.”

Read the article.




Barnes & Thornburg Adds Veteran Labor And Employment Partner In Grand Rapids

Barnes & Thornburg has added veteran labor attorney Grant T. Pecor as a partner in its Labor and Employment practice. Pecor will work out of the firm’s Grand Rapids and Chicago offices.

A nationally recognized attorney in his field, Pecor limits his practice to the representation of employers in both the public and private sectors. He has represented employers across industries while developing a sophisticated focus in the areas of health care and transit.

In doing so, he has not only represented clients at the bargaining table, but also in virtually all aspects of labor and employment law, including grievance arbitrations, representation proceedings, unfair labor practice proceedings and matters before other state and federal administrative agencies. He also provides general counsel on labor and employment-related matters.

Pecor is a well-recognized thought leader and regularly serves as the keynote speaker for the Health Care Association of Michigan’s annual conference and has presented to audiences like the Bernard Gottfried Memorial Labor Law Symposium and American Bar Association. He is a contributing editor of Bloomberg BNA’s The Developing Labor Law and a long-time member of the American Bar Association’s Committee on the Development of the Law Under the National Labor Relations Act.

Pecor earned his J.D., cum laude, from Michigan State University College of Law and his B.A. from James Madison College (Social Relations) at Michigan State University.




Brian Corrigan Elected to the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel as a Fellow

Farrell Fritz is pleased to announce that Brian P. Corrigan has been elected to the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel (ACTEC) as a Fellow.

Corrigan, a Garden City, NY, resident, is a partner in the firm’s estate litigation practice group. He earned his J.D. at Hofstra University School of Law and his B.A., cum laude, from Providence College. Last year, he named a Fellow of the New York Bar Foundation.

ACTEC is a national organization of more than 2,500 lawyers and law professors. Fellows are elected by their peers and must have more than 10 years of experience in the active practice of probate and trust law or estate planning in addition to an outstanding reputation, exceptional skill, and substantial contributions to the field by lecturing, writing, teaching and participating in bar activities.




Appeals Court Overturns Record $706M San Antonio Jury Verdict

“A state appeals court Wednesday overturned a record $706 million verdict rendered by a San Antonio jury more than two years ago,” reports Patrick Danner in San Antonio Express News’ Business.

“The 4th Court of Appeals in San Antonio reversed a trial court’s judgment on real estate analytic firm HouseCanary Inc.’s fraud and misappropriation of trade secret claims against Amrock Inc., a Detroit home appraisal company affiliated with Quicken Loans Inc. Amrock formerly was known as Title Source Inc.”

“The two claims were sent back to a state District Court in San Antonio for a new trial.”

Read the article.




2 More Law Firms Announce Pay Cuts; Are They a Stopgap Measure Before Layoffs?

“Two more law firms announced pay cuts in the past week, marking a third slow week of bad news,” reports Debra Cassens Weiss in ABA Journal’s News.

“If larger law firms lose the same percentage of lawyers as in 2008 to 2010 during the financial downturn, there will be 20,000 jobs lost, Simons wrote. Most of the departures—17,000 of them—would be in the nation’s top 100 grossing law firms, he said. The other 3,000 departures would be in second hundred firms.”

“The entire legal services sector has already surpassed that number in job losses. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the sector lost 64,000 jobs in April.”

“The two firms that announced cuts in the past week are Reed Smith and Stroock & Stroock & Lavan.”

Read the article.




Court Enters Judgment Totaling More Than $32 Million on Jury’s $10.8 Million Verdict

“Shortly before COVID-19 halted jury proceedings across the United States, a Mississippi jury sided with the Government to return a $10.8 million verdict against Stone County Hospital and several affiliates for what the jury found were false Medicare claims submitted in violation of the False Claims Act (“FCA”),” reports Siena Caruso in Dorsey & Whitney’s Penalties.

“In May 2007 a complaint was filed alleging the Defendants submitted false records to secure payment under Medicare for services not actually performed and otherwise conspired to submit false claims in violation of the FCA. The Government investigated for nearly eight years before intervening in the lawsuit in 2015.”

“The intervening complaint contained detailed allegations that the Defendants and others abused the special Medicare rules for Critical Access Hospitals from 2004 through 2015 by improperly claiming expenses for work not performed. Such false claims allegedly included the excessive and unwarranted compensation of Mr. Cain—who owned both Stone County Hospital and Corporate Management—as well as claims submitted for Mr. Cain’s personal luxury automobiles. The Government further alleged that Stone County Hospital’s Medicare cost reports misallocated expenses of Corporate Management to the hospital and contained inflated, unnecessary, and duplicative costs purportedly incurred by Corporate Management and related businesses owned by Mr. Cain. The Government alleged the Defendants submitted false records and statements to Medicare seeking reimbursement for these false and fraudulent expenses.”

“After a nine-week trial, a Mississippi jury returned a $10.8 million guilty verdict against Ted Cain, Julie Cain, Stone County Hospital, Corporate Management, and Tommy Kuluz on March 12, 2020. The jury found the sixth defendant—Starann Lamier, the Chief Operating Officer of Corporate Management—not guilty.”

Read the article.




MBA Taps Michael Briggs As New SVP And General Counsel

“The Mortgage Bankers Association named Michael Briggs as its new senior vice president and general counsel. Briggs joins the MBA from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, where he most recently served as Assistant General Counsel for the Consumer Law Section,” reports National Mortgage Professionals.

“The Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) named Michael Briggs as its new senior vice president and general counselBriggs will serve as MBA’s chief legal officer and will be responsible for managing the legal affairs of the association and its subsidiaries and affiliates. He will also oversee the human resources department and the MBA Opens Doors Foundation, MBA’s 501(c)(3) charity that provides mortgage and rental payment assistance to families with critically-ill or injured children, allowing parents and guardians to be by a child’s side during treatment.”

“Prior to joining MBA, Briggs spent a dozen years at the FDIC, where he held a number of leadership roles within the legal division. As assistant general counsel for the consumer law section, he led a team that delivered advice and counsel throughout the agency on a variety of consumer protection, real estate finance, bank supervision, enforcement, financial technology, community development, and economic inclusion matters.”

Read the article.




Centre for Information Policy Leadership at Hunton Andrews Kurth Issues Report on Accountability in Data Privacy

To help businesses build effective privacy compliance programs that also enable responsible uses of data, the Centre for Information Policy Leadership at Hunton Andrews Kurth has issued a report on how leading companies have implemented robust privacy programs and accountability controls.

The report is the culmination of CIPL’s Accountability Mapping Project, launched in September 2019. It is based on interviews with numerous organizations with mature privacy programs and an analysis of their specific accountability practices. It provides examples of how organizations in different sectors and geographies, and of various sizes, implement effective data privacy management programs and how these programs map to the CIPL Accountability Framework, which was previously outlined here.

The COVID-19 crisis has highlighted the importance of implementing organizational accountability through data privacy and governance programs. This enables businesses and government agencies to effectively leverage personal data and modern technologies to address public health emergencies without undermining the privacy of individuals. With the acceleration of data-driven innovation and the digital transformation of society in the post-COVID world, corporate boards and senior leaders will be addressing data privacy as a business and trust imperative. This report provides practical examples of how leading organizations implement data privacy accountability measures and embed accountability into their organizational ethos.

“The findings of our report demonstrate that we are squarely moving into the era of data privacy accountability. Enlightened senior leaders in businesses and public bodies see accountability as a board-level business and data strategy issue, and a prerequisite for public trust and sustainable data uses,” CIPL President Bojana Bellamy said. “This report shows that accountability is scalable to both big and small organizations. It illustrates best-in-class practices and success stories to support the effectiveness of an accountability framework in promoting responsible data practices.”

CIPL has worked extensively on privacy accountability and has been advocating for the implementation of accountability principles by organizations around the world. Accountability is also being championed by visionary senior leaders and chief privacy officers in the world’s leading companies and has been encouraged by many forward-thinking data privacy regulators and lawmakers in the US, Canada, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Latin America. Additionally, many jurisdictions such as the European Union, Brazil, Singapore, India and Canada have incorporated, or are in the process of incorporating, accountability into their data protection laws.

Download the report.




Nine Bradley Attorneys Named 2020 Florida Super Lawyers or Rising Stars

TAMPA – Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP is pleased to announce that nine attorneys in the firm’s Tampa office have been named 2020 Florida Super Lawyers or Rising Stars, who are recognized as among the leading lawyers in the state.

The firm’s Florida Super Lawyers and their recognized practice areas are:

• Timothy A. Andreu, partner; Banking and Financial Services Practice Group (Business Litigation)
• Michael B. Colgan, counsel; Litigation Practice Group (Business Litigation)
• Robert B. Glenn, retired partner; Bankruptcy and Creditors’ Rights Practice Group (Bankruptcy: Business)
• Mark A. Hanley, counsel; Labor and Employment Practice Group (Employment & Labor)
• Craig Mayfield, partner; Litigation Practice Group (Personal Injury – Products: Defense)
• Edwin G. Rice, counsel; Bankruptcy and Creditors’ Rights Practice Group (Bankruptcy: Business)
• Alysa J. Ward, partner; Labor and Employment Practice Group (Employment & Labor)

The firm’s Florida Rising Stars and their recognized practice areas are:

• Sara D. Accardi, associate; Litigation Practice Group (Business Litigation)
• Tabitha S. Etlinger, senior attorney; Banking and Financial Services Practice Group (Employment & Labor)

“We are very proud of our Florida attorneys who have been named as among the top practitioners in the state and congratulate them on their successes that have resulted in their ranking as Super Lawyers and Rising Stars,” said Bradley Chairman of the Board and Managing Partner Jonathan M. Skeeters.

Only the top 5 percent of lawyers in Florida are named Super Lawyers. No more than 2.5 percent of lawyers in the state are selected as Rising Stars, who must be 40 years old or younger or have been in practice for 10 or fewer years. Published by Thomson Reuters, Super Lawyers uses independent research, peer nominations and peer evaluations to determine the honorees. The Super Lawyers and Rising Stars lists will be published in June in the Florida Super Lawyers Magazine. The lists also are distributed to attorneys and ABA-accredited law school libraries.

About Bradley
Bradley combines skilled legal counsel with exceptional client service and unwavering integrity to assist a diverse range of corporate and individual clients in achieving their business goals. With offices in Alabama, Florida, Mississippi, North Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and the District of Columbia, the firm’s nearly 550 lawyers represent regional, national and international clients in various industries, including banking and financial services, construction, energy, healthcare, life sciences, manufacturing, real estate, and technology, among many others.




Yelp Review Leads to N.J. Lawyer’s Suspension Where Client Info was not “Generally Known”

“Just because information relating to your representation of a client might be publicly available, your duty of confidentiality means that you can’t disclose it if it is not ‘generally known.’ The two concepts — public availability and being ‘generally known’ — are not the same, as a New Jersey lawyer learned earlier this month when the state supreme court imposed a one-year suspension in a disciplinary case that (among other things) involved a Yelp review,” reports Karen Rubin in Thompson Hine’s in The Law for Lawyers Today Confidentiality.

“According to the disciplinary board’s decision, the lawyer represented a client in a child custody matter and achieved a ‘seemingly good result’ via settlement. Over a year later, however, the client posted ‘poor reviews’of the lawyer’s services on several websites. In turn, as set out in the board decision, the lawyer posted a review of the client’s massage business on Yelp, where he said that the client ‘is a convicted felon for fleeing the state with children. A wonderful parent. Additionally, she has been convicted of shoplifting from a supermarket. Hide your wallets well during a massage. Ooops, almost forgot about the DWI conviction. Well maybe a couple of beers during a massage would be nice.'”

“After the client complained, the lawyer sought to explain his actions, according to the board decision. He admitted he was ‘very upset’ by the client’s negative Yelp rating of his practice, and felt that his response was justified because ‘what was good for the goose was good for the gander.'”

Read the article.




Two Lawyers Arrested in Molotov Cocktail Attack on Police in Brooklyn

“A Princeton graduate and a human rights lawyer were both charged in an attack that left a police car dashboard charred. No one was injured,” report William K. Rashbaum and Andrea Salcedo in The New York Times.

“Two lawyers were charged with taking part in a Molotov cocktail attack on a police patrol car over the weekend — a human rights lawyer and a Princeton-educated associate at a Manhattan law firm.”

“The attack during the Brooklyn protests left the dashboard of a blue-and-white police car charred after a night of violent clashes between protesters and police, a symbol of the chaos wrought over a weekend of sometimes peaceful and sometimes violent demonstrations.”

“Both were arrested shortly after the incident early Saturday during protests against the killing of George Floyd, federal authorities said.”

Read the article.




Denny’s Appoints Gail S. Myers As General Counsel

Gail Sharps Myers will be joining Denny’s as General Counsel. Myers will head Denny’s legal functions, reports Denny’s in Cision PR Newswire.

“Prior to joining Denny’s, Ms. Myers served as the Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer for American Tire Distributors, Inc. In this role, she led the American Tire Distributor’s corporate governance and compliance functions and handled matters relating to financial reporting, M&A, labor and employment, real estate, litigation, data privacy and government affairs.”

“Gail Myers’ additional experience includes serving as Senior Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Chief Compliance Counsel at U.S. Foods and Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary at Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. She holds a Juris Doctorate from The American University’s Washington College of Law and a Master of Business Administration Degree from The Arizona State University’s W.P. Carey School of Business.”

Read the article.




Biglaw Firm Late on Rent — to the Tune of $3.7 Million — According to Landlord

“A Biglaw firm finds itself the defendant in a lawsuit over an issue a lot of folks feel right now — late rent,” reports Kathryn Rubino in Above the Law’s Biglaw.

“According to the lawsuit, filed in Illinois, the Biglaw firm of Jenner & Block is behind on its rent for the firm’s Chicago office. Landlord Hart 353 North Clark LLC, affiliate of global real estate investment management firm Heitman LLC, said in a lawsuit filed May 20th in Cook County Circuit Court the firm owes $3,726,415.74, plus late fees and interest, for its 416,000+ square feet of office space.”

“But not so fast, the firm contends their lease provides an out. Randy Mehrberg, co-managing partner, that the firm’s partners are availing themselves of a provision in their lease agreement that provides rent abatement if the space cannot be used as intended. And he assures everyone this rent dispute is not a harbinger of financial troubles for the firm.”

Read the article.




Buchalter Adds Additional Attorneys in San Diego

Buchalter is pleased to welcome new litigators Vincent Whittaker and Skye Daley to its San Diego office. Both Whittaker and Daley’s primary focus is complex business and commercial litigation throughout California.

Whittaker is an experienced federal and state trial lawyer with approximately two decades of handling high-stakes complex commercial litigation. He handles a wide variety of commercial business disputes, including lender liability, complex real estate matters, construction disputes, breach of contract, employment discrimination, negligent misrepresentation and fraud, trade secret and unfair competition, as well as shareholder and partnership disputes.

Committed to philanthropy, Whittaker is currently a board member for the Southwestern Growers Committee. He has also been recognized as a “Top Lawyer” (Business & Commercial Litigation), by Palm Springs Life Magazine from 2011-2019.

Daley’s experience includes representing clients in both federal and state court, as well as in arbitration and in administrative proceedings. He has extensive experience representing employers in a variety of employment matters, advising his clients on questions of labor and employment compliance, and successfully asserting client rights in copyright and trade secret disputes.




Concerns as Companies Reopen Workplaces Amid COVID-19, Littler Survey Finds

Littler, the world’s largest employment and labor law practice representing management, has released the results of its COVID-19 Return to Work Survey Report, completed by 1,010 in-house counsel, human resources professionals and C-suite executives.

As states increasingly relax stay-at-home orders, Littler’s survey highlights the range of complex issues facing employers as they plan to reopen their workplaces in the wake of COVID-19. Employers’ concerns centered on when to bring employees back and how to do so safely, how to accommodate increasing remote-work requests and liability concerns stemming from the rise in COVID-19-related employment claims and lawsuits.

“While many businesses and their employees are eager to return to a sense of normalcy and resume in-office operations, they face a host of unknowns when it comes to what the workplace looks like in a COVID-19 era,” said Alka Ramchandani-Raj, a leader of Littler’s COVID-19 Task Force. “Particularly given the wide-ranging, and often conflicting, guidelines from state and local officials, employers are left to balance multiple logistical, emotional and legal concerns in determining whether, when and how to reopen their workplaces.”

Timing to Reopen and Safety Concerns

Most respondents from businesses not considered essential – and thus not already open – appear ready to return to the physical workplace. More than three-quarters (78 percent) say they will reopen within three months, with 34 percent of those respondents planning to do so within one month.

At the same time, employers are moving forward with caution, as only 18 percent plan to bring employees back immediately after stay-at-home orders expire. Another 33 percent will wait a few weeks and 42 percent plan to take a “wait and see” approach to gauge the outcome of other business’ reopening efforts.

Employers are also taking numerous steps to maintain employees’ safety, including increased cleaning (90 percent), limiting employee contact in common areas (87 percent), providing and/or encouraging the use of face coverings or other protective gear (86 percent) and modifying workspaces to maintain safe distances (78 percent). In written feedback, many respondents expressed concern about the difficulty of ensuring employees follow new safety guidelines, as well as upholding their workplace culture and employee morale while implementing safety measures.

More than half (58 percent) of respondents also plan to conduct testing or health screenings on employees, with most referring to temperature checks (89 percent) and symptom screenings (72 percent) and a small number selecting antibody (8 percent) and antigen (7 percent) tests. Yet while the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has released some guidance about screening employees for COVID-19, uncertainty remains around implementation, privacy matters and litigation risks.

“There is no ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to returning to work, which makes the process all the more challenging for employers,” said Melissa Peters, a leader of Littler’s COVID-19 Task Force. “However, in the health and safety realm, communications and training have always played a vital role and are especially paramount now given the stress and anxiety everyone is under as the pandemic continues to unfold.”

Managing Remote Work Accommodations

The pandemic has drastically shifted the remote work landscape, and for some workers, the shift could be permanent. Half of survey respondents are considering requiring more employees to work remotely to reduce physical office costs. Most employers surveyed also report being amenable to accommodating work from home requests: 52 percent are willing to be flexible on granting valid requests until the pandemic subsides, while 30 percent are open to changing their remote work policies and allowing employees to remain remote if they have proven effective working outside of the office.

“Managing employee leave and accommodation requests was already an area fraught with difficulty and potential liabilities for employers, and COVID-19 has only exacerbated that,” said Michelle Barrett Falconer, Co-Chair of Littler’s Leaves of Absence and Disability Accommodation Practice Group. “Effectively handling these issues will require adhering to an ever-evolving patchwork of federal, state and local laws while ensuring procedures for remote work are applied consistently, without any discriminatory impact on certain groups.”

Employer Liability Concerns

As the debate over granting employers “liability shields” to protect against COVID-19 lawsuits rages on in Congress, 71 percent of in-house counsel respondents report being at least somewhat concerned about potential lawsuits upon reopening. Only 6 percent say that they are not concerned at all. As for the bevy of claims and lawsuits employers could face, respondents ranked leaves of absence entitlements (68 percent), unsafe working conditions (59 percent) and workers’ compensation (43 percent) as the top three areas in which they expect to see an uptick.

“The wave of COVID-19 litigation has begun in haste and poses a real threat to employers, most of whom are already grappling with the economic fallout from this pandemic,” said Michael Lotito, Co-Chair of Littler’s Workplace Policy Institute. “In the face of so much uncertainty, legislative safeguards and clear guidance from federal and state agencies are important in providing employers with sufficient confidence to reopen their workplaces – and to do so in compliance with the law.”

Download the Littler COVID-19 Return to Work Survey Report.

View the survey infographic.




COVID-19: Due Diligence Considerations for M&A Transactions

“Buyers in M&A transactions should consider a number of due diligence items in response to COVID-19 and the governmental response thereto,” write Thomas W. Christopher and Alexander B. Johnson in Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance.

“As parties pursue mergers and acquisitions transactions during, and in the wake of, the COVID-19 pandemic, both buyers and targets should consider a number of factors from a due diligence perspective, including the impact of COVID-19 and related developments on the target from a legal, compliance, human resources, business, insurance, financial, and operational perspective. This post identifies some of the issues buyers should consider when undertaking legal due diligence in connection with an M&A transaction, and highlights for targets some of the types of due diligence questions they may need to address.”

“As with any due diligence investigation, due diligence related to the COVID-19 pandemic should be tailored to the particular target company. Accordingly, the applicability of each of the topics discussed below will likely vary based on the particular target company, its industry and geography, and a number of other factors.”

Read the article.